From this time on, for a while, I'll address with some trials for explaining and explicating another system toward dualism and that trial's legitimacy. 

As first what I have to say, by the way my suggesion is never yet widely recognized, because my suggestion must intend to create another loop against dualism, actually now whole world human social order is only dependent on dualism.
However, at least in terms of philosophy and logics, the system not relying on only dualism must have hade been thought so deeply, that example must be found at John McTaggart at 19century second half and Saul Kripke at 20century middle term. Kripke's supposing possible world semantics must be one of resistant suggestion to dualism, because ordinarily mathematics must rely on only synthecized data inducing indicator, that must consist in only + and − elemental order. Data must depend on only past index indicating statistical presumption, and necessarily it must never take the future accompanying uncetainty as not + nor −. But frankly speaking, possible world must never be discribed with + nor −.

Neverthless, now operating all computer system is just depend on dualism with binary. Even if that system could be adopted to suppositively taken into three, any advancing as another dimension taken account system must never be outptted, because its advancing must be nothing but 1 and 0, also to that domain, we must introduce one more cardinally integral item.

A the matter of fact somewhat + nor −, and at arithmetic system and in temrs of usage third dimensioned number as degital notation, 1 nor 0 must be necessary at my suggestive theory.

If that suggestive trial was embodied so completely, presumably as my idea could solve all so contradictory issues unsolved and yet elucidated itmes could be solved.
In other words, even if any advancing must be created by philosophy and logics, e.g. our holding very nasty issue as that what we discribe at sentences could be similarly accepted by readers nevertheless internally and immnnently very mutually gapped idea in a nreality both writerd have each very distanced idea. That contradictory must be made by dualism's incompletion, as my idea. of course is just my subjectively idea popping at my mind, but at least at logics, already logical system's progressive notional and conceptual suppostion as with bigger number than two as dual order has been tought by many reserchers. I have only the idea around it.

Next, I'll explain the reason why I think dualism is incomplete and it should be revised with our idea and  the reason why I think that dualism is incomplete and it should be revised with our idea and another system should be tought and practical application should be necessary. 
That is so simple. Because dual number combination must introduce us as calculators to the modus ponens of thinking in terms of mutual oppositional thinking circuit and presumptive aspect in our brain. Then if we introduce our habitual conceptual thinking method somewhat another dimensioned thinking circuit not relying on mutual hostile configulating modus ponens thining habit, computer system's stubborn nature and incomplete data outputting reality could have been reformed. 

Ultimately, dual conceptual thinking method must intend to affirmation and negation and leaving and deleting, as standing at only versus using explicable disposition.
As its typical thing is display as next, ◎◎◎, but if we adopt like next,
　◎　　　　◎
◎　◎ or ◎◎　　presumably we could take and get some another typed thinking curcuit.
Then, please remember former Part5, and 6. Left one is just corresponded with our daily business job mission practicing method and latter is just Heidegger's ontological applicable method, and we could use both perfectly diffrentiated typed of thinking method at a stretch with upper displayed graphical numeric notation system. Necessarily these could be applied either to computation at Big Data system with AI managing system.

By the way, at political scene, many wise politicians have had told that if people gather as three number, faction must be made. In other words, even three persons could be divided one and two. Certainly all people's relation and relevance must be one of survival game, you know. However if some so wiser one are present and says next, " But we could apply that triplism could be adapted either to seven combination as dividably four and three, two and two and three, as if many number's rulling party's members could repeat separation and aggregation. 
In other words, cardinally and so principly, this triplism's suggestion must be just the first step, or phase or grade. That could be advanced five, seven, and nine as odd number advancing applicable deployment.

If my suggesting argorhythm's advancing system was accompanied with future posibility, number displaying order's arbitrary can create conversion and arranging between or with coordination and creating a mutually competitive reality, according to each occasional judging reacting each necessity.

Necessarily if that suggestion was embodied at this earth, these systematized revision must contribute either worldwide two dividable hostility with Freedom Respecting country and Planned Economy country at mitigating chance holding affordance. 

Then, next chance to debate, we will have the possibilities at future emobodiment of another domain's application in contempating together. That must be so integral for future human beings' daily life's practical integrity. 
(to be continued)

Jan. 20th. 2021