Actually, since nowadays, we have kept only the recognition that one is totalized bird's eyes view structualism and evenly paralelled structual invalidating system as anti-structualism are belonging to the same, major scaled another strucutre, that must be the now working thinking order or commonsense. But that idea has no capacity to our own view which Heisenberg had advocated as Uncertainty principle. In other words, that nowadays' methodizention's incomleteness must be ignorance to our own view, necessarily it must be applied to now as our the sole indicator of substentiality not belonging to past nor future neither.

These debates deducing very integral truth must be that what we grasp totalaized system wth structualism and every element paralelled even integirity given system in synthsis must have contradiciton, that must be similar to capitalism and communism in contradiction.
In other words, any part as us in terms of individual internally held mind as immanently and that calculating creating error as observers' view, we could deduce that structual grip as totalized view and each elemental checking to any part in accod needs necessarily the third dimensioned cognitive indicator as our view creating also error, and it must be applicable to anytime our sensible only now. Totalized structural grasp must be past, and each elementally caring must be future presopective stance. But these two item usage must have shortage, that must be our mind as holding not past nor future prespective present somewhat.

These three dimensiones regognition means that we as human individual must have both very personally private memory, knowledge, and wishing and hoping to future, but simltaneously we either have very honest and deligently obedient rule strictly adherent our nature as our publicly regarding belonging consciousness as attribution. 
By the way, since noew traditional philosophy must have had ignore and dared to neglecting that idea, and they have left that issue to sociologists or so. 
But if we introduce that thrid very contradictory and ambivalent our idea and that holding conceptual indicator could be introduced to mathematics' fundamental principle, we presumably could solve so many now yet enigmatic many unsolved paradox, or so could be elucidated or we will figure them with Lehman conjecture and pi or so. 

Already mentioned ideas could have the another idea that + nor − could never take charge too. And that embodiment must have ever never outputted another dimentional epistemologic idea accompanied with us.

That must mean that past as never gettable and only confirmable at record (as our all consensus not contradictory to our own memory) in 〇ΙΙ◎Ι◉, just for our now 〇ΙΙ, but toward the future we have only concept as Ι◉, but simultaneously it means just our publicly admittable index as job mission accompanying our anticipatory index, and actually at our personal mind, either the anxiety to the future coming all uncertainty, then essentially in terms of near future, centainly Ι◉ as not now but it must come, that must be applicable to our understanding so offcially, our accompanying anxious and peccimistic prospect and negative probability could never be displayed at that optimistic illustrated formula, then it must necessarily be either ΙΙ◎or 〇. and it necessarily deduce that only now must become ◉.
In other words, at the matter of fact, our job missioned consciousness all are composed with Heidgger's very important main concept as in Zein unt Zeit as Being and Time, verfallen as in English expiry as meant we are obliged to be at falsehood, in terms of having oblivion to our being fact as his another main concept, Seinsvergessenheit asin English, oblivion to being. 

If these serially logical elucidatory thinking experiment was so appropriate or correctly accountable, presumably we could solve so long span we have been obliged to have gaps between natural science and philosophy or logics at contemprary eras' deployment since older eras, and biological commonsense with Darwinism essentially equal to natural selection and physics. Because all these mutual gap must be outptted by our neglecting mutual discord at mathematic's arithmetic and argorhythm making together our facing gap necessarily.

At next chance to debate, we will confront now our suffering crisis with corona virus pandemic and our usage of our eledtronic equipment and any other procedure to machines and medicine issue as our holding mutually gapped constitution and our mental typed tendency. In these analysis, we'd think of computer and our usage's issue as propositional analytical elucidation.
(to be continued)

Jan. 20th. 2021