I am not professional at being engaged in Econmics, then just my impressive idea, it was, I want to deicribe some very problematic content seen to me, for the present.

One is Ecnomics has some each diffrentiated method with macro and micro it, but that discernment is not so integral to my viewpoint. Rather Economics' stance taking at totalized aspect to all econmically thought activity and its outputted truth is to some extent, for economists, mutually agreed criterion or so, but to it, I cannot have so enough consensus.
Because financing decision could be so arbitrary at practicing at each occasion, and its revenue and rate of return could be originally so subjective at anyone faces that outputted result economical criterion. In other words, Economics' stance in terms of data indication could include either so subjectively tortalized aspect and viewpoint, but actually all those aspects could be seen so specific to any individual citizen. In other words, totalized view's composed factor by itself should be reviewed and re-inspected. Necessarily that my view originated in philosophical commonsense, then necessarily either it could be one of subjectively thought idea, you know, but that angled view could be either possible and effective, I can have the tought so far.

Economical totalized view as to some extent seen so the fairest idea as index could be one of so subjective view, at least in terms of philosophy, that standpoint could never be ineffective. 

Then, here I want to provide some our each expediently useful index as what we can refer our next goal setting, or kind of personal mindset resetting for personal assessment to our own past data and totalized own proposition setting.

First, we can look at our own acting driven outputted data, that could be shown to next.

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　-1ー0ー +1

To our set next goal setting, we can describe it with -1, on the other hand, we can show our acting for getting outputted achievement with 0, because it must never have our achieved data. But after we get acheived indication at set scheduled date, in taking it we could regard that result as 1.

This basic recognition is first set, and next to its date and acting situation's producing result, we could set our own(subjective) assessed evaluation, it could be displayed like next.

                                                             +1     +1
                                                            ／＼ ／＼
                                                      　-1 ー 0 ー +1
                                                            ＼／ ＼／
                                                             -1      -1

Upper diaglam is on upper as revenue and lower as profit decline. Necessarily I just display 
+1 +1 and  -1 -1 arbitraily, any other option is necessary with both at upper and lower, +1 -1 and -1 +1.

These serially done recognition means that our personally cognitive -1 ー 0 ー 1 in relevance could mean standard value in terms of date setting. But simultaneously it could mean at my supposition either auxiliary variable, otherwise, parameter.

At the matter of fact, which we apply our publicly set date with its order, and our own(personally or privately) set date with our own assessing to our act.

Then, principly our cognitive order with -1 ー 0 ー 1 could be displayed at next formula.

　(-1 ー 0 ー 1)∨( +1 +1,  -1 -1, +1 -1, -1 +1) ⇒ 
                                       ∃! (-1 ー 0 ー 1) = (+1 +1)∨(-1 -1)∨(+1 -1)∨(-1 +1)

Necessaarily, upper formula could mean or display our each spending time at doing anything with aim. Principly it defines the time running in acting duration. 
Then, necessarily, revenue and profit decline in assessing means our intrspectively subjective next goal setting. 

Our mindset could evidence that ordinarily standard value in terms of date switching running and its functioning as auxiliary variable, parameter. Its ambivalent nature evidences that all mono presence could have unidentified nature which could reject straightforward interpretation, and either that thing could be another proposition we  should analyze and formulate as evidencing.

(to be continued)

Apr. 1st.   2021