Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Sensing Part1

Human mind usually senses foreign elements holder relatively than myself as each one's sensitivity, outsider so negatively seen to myself. That sensing is so subtly held at mind.


And almost ones are unexpectedly unexceptional at assessing to any other one, because nobody could know how the one could be seen by any other one, necessarily probably each one has each distinct view to the one.


Just we at some mind, for protecting own security, subconsciously and so consciously look for specifically seen so dangerous one, so almost autonomously.


And necessarily, only partial seemed so the likes of foreigner could be so outstanding at least to the one. Because only the seen so exceptional one is seen so extremely different at least to the one.


TThe kind of sensing capability means human's originally internally equipped protective instinct. Anybody arbitrarily subconsciously nets the kind of safty insurance.


And all these things must be the truth that almost ones as human are evil-minded and at least to me, the one whose nature is never so were just two or so, at least to me, at any circle, work, generation, gender.


Thus human's inherently preserved the protective nature means so arbitrary at personal judgment, and to some extent so selfish too, and there may be the truth that the kind of our mind's nature could be a strict cause to make human-being die out. Ultimately, we could presume so either. Because that each mind's synthesized condition put together the same nuance of mind could generate any kind of hostility.


Then, necessarily, that sensing instinct could sustain the own domesticity in which any kind of group consciousness must be made so consequently. Also conservative idea, ideology could be constructed there. Nationalism either.


Then, almost parts of individual ones belong to that instinct managing presence, we could say so. That reality holding instinct to discriminate originally outed mentality ones are easily seen in bany society.  However, very exceptional ones in terms of the nature must exist, but they try never to be seen so outstanding then,  necessarily, they are obliged  to take their  stance to be a sleeper, so personally.


However, very strangely, these any  country holding minority has only so not belonging consciousness, then, consequently the most majority must realize at whole this  globe levelled  scale,  in  other  words, at ant country, any majority is obliged to be confined at one specific group, necessarily that truth could be adapted to any small group.   


And almost prosperous ethnic groups are successful at having strongly national power and its solidarity, that must be sustained by that majority as awaked ones not as sleepers. Nevertheless, that truth is never adapted to all human society, very exceptional ethnic groups certainly exist.


Nevertheless, even if all these things could be the convincing truths, nobody could have conviction which the one belongs to majority or minority in terms of type of the one, as excuding one in outing act, behavior, taken stance which seems to be so necessary to the one, necessarily the one could affirmate these things positively, as the position of majority, or not as being obliged to get the one outed so easily.


Nevertheless again, these regard or ideas certainly are made by our idea's convention reliant on just dechotomy or duality, in other words, anybody could have both condition, according to each occasionally forcible situation or condition we have circumstance in mind for practical worldly issues.
Then necessarily, we all are either both typed positioned reality depends on each social situation. Consequently, more or less, most or least, anybody has both nature and transaction we can take at each position. 


By the way, Jesus Christ absolutely was never at least majority's elemental positioned one, that thing must be told to anybody, probably. 
Even if Jesus's pureness as ethically not prejudiced or kind of transcendentally even to anybody could never be reproduced as long as our whole world order could be at not so radically switched now condition. Necessarily another possibility could be set at least our imagination or so radical presumption, but that thing is for the present held back to the future, for me.
Nevertheless, very occasionally, similar typed one is appearing at any site, we could say so either. Necessarily the kind of ones could not appear so sporuadically, we must know it, but if we were confront so critically serious survival crisis, His reproducing possibilty could have us involved with in terms of obliged delibaration. Just actually very vaguely similar to Him could as fixed ratio, so lazily regularly exist at any site, we could say also so.


And, what I thought of until now at this article is never the political issue as so simple reality holding problem, importantly, this interperetation does never belong to categorization as academic study cognition. In other words, these mentionings are never politically reasonable ideological issue, but it must be more seriously our inherently holding immanently grave somewhat to us, you know! Because these our inevitable mind holding nature means individually our irresistibly never given up personal mind's issue.
In other words, that thing must not be just definitely nature  nor individual procrastinative mindset issue, it must be another dimensioned thing as what even we can hardly identify with only introspectively in the term of philosophy, namely these things are based on so instinctive sensing power we could have never known.


Then, this subject could never be analyzed so easily, that thing could be interpreted with uncertainty theory by Heisenberg✽, if it is so conceptually schematic. In other words, if it belongs to so sensitive factor, we can hardly be successful at analyzing it so at clearized summary.


And very normally sensing ones are usually generally majority, we could easily redress, if we are at introspective time home so alone, recollectively thinking to own acts and behavior. In other words, not so smartly ascribing any issue so regarding it as externally caused, the kind of very awkwardly acting and showing the one's potential idea to any other one must become some so masochistic scapegoat by any other one. Any kind of artist, musicians, singers are generally taking that demerit of their nature advantage of getting successful social postion. In other words, very unskillful not dodging ones are easily targetted by majority derogating ones. In conclusion, to be general, they would become the target dennounced by any other so cleverly ascribing anything to the ones, they just don't want to be rresponsible at core issue at society, because they know that these seen core issues are never be solved so easily. With these serially stepped process, all outed, excluded ones as foreign elemental ones are made so necessarily at natural human ideas' current.


Eventually, fundamentally, we could never know and see completely any other one's mind and idea not as well as the idea or looking to our own them. And probalby any society exits in this globe must move on this implicit unwritten law. Nevertheless, actually, anytime we essentially, even mutually independently to any other one, but synchronically at half mind, so potentially positively mutually hostile, the manner to some extent could be recognizable to any member so tacitly, if that mind in tacit group's consensus was absent from our mind so perfectly, that society must fall into very unhealthy mutually only no competition could be necessarily demanded, that kind of no progressively proceeding conservative bureaucrats' society, in it anybody could have only totalitarianism justice in establishing only totalized object.


By the way, which is more contradictory, in the term of country as nation, patriots and that consciousness not so stronger ones, nevertheless, not completely anarchist, two typed citizens are present as componental element in terms of personal consciousness, at this regard, how can we regard some our mind's inevitably indwelled idea around ethnicity, or racially regarded constitutionally conditioned internally holding our immanent idea or so?
That kind of mind regard occasionally works out so fruitage and effectvely utilzed by all nationa;ities, but not so as only negative sequel given case could be pictured to us, so far, and only that question must be left to us, so necessarily.
(to be continued)





May. 4, 5th.   2021