Verb’s our daily usage and its mechanical functioning's essence could be regarded as so integrally at inspecting our mind's idea around prohibition to seemed taboo things in consciousness, and that consciousness dragging ethical judging in mind and that logical consideration are constantly standing by at accepting our questioning.

Our continuously regarding feasible and infeasible judging around usage of verbs and really speaking or talking occasion must drive us have very careful and insightful introspecting mind toward properness at acting and replacing at embodiment from only having idea in mind through e.g. mentioning to some other one or, questioning to the one or so.

There again I quot Paul Recoer's very penetrating text of synthecized philosophy idea mentioning "On Selfhood, the Quetion of personal Identity" in the termn of both Analytical philosophy and phenomenology.
This remarakably superior text has clearly discerned two symmetrical conceptual approach.
That is title showing Selfhood and Identity.

There, one is so simply categorizable approach should be submitted, like one is Only internally imagining, picturing, and thinking verbs Part 9 indicated.
And next is generally, acting verbs including any kind of setting verbs for making situation with declaring stopping, pausing, finishing, ending, completing, otherwise, switching, altering, and generally all objectively done changing. Necessarily they includes either each verb of starting, restarting or resuming it.

Toward it, as another usage of only internally mind holding idea's verbs (imagine, think, picture, assume, presume, infer, expect, anticipate, want, hope, wish or so), more largely significant and either so continuous and at any keeping aspect, sustaining meant verbs could be raised here, that includes (have, keep, hold). By the way, at a glance we can these are very basic verbs, but at the matter of fact, the kinds of abstract verbs could have another very precisely small but so minute meaning which could be held at our usage.(e. g. have in mind, keep in mind, hold on, hold back or so).

Here,daringly let us have strictly categorizing conclusion once, that is like next.

✴1. "Mind State Signified verbs" with have, keep, hold or so.(either get, bocome)

✴2. Only mentally, spiritually internally indwelling or keeping idea signified verbs (let's call them "Idea verbs" with imagine, picuture, think, see, understand, interpret, (necessarily these are easily replaced with really mentionable act and manifesting or decraging emobodied act, too like1).

✴3. "Publicly Spoken verbs", as generally mainly spoken, talked, or told verbs with say, speak, talk, tell, mention, inform, report, explain, define, interpret, analyze or so.

✴4. "Very Concrete Acting verbs" with act, perform, play, do, or so.

✴5. This is the same category to ✴4, but specifically clearizing only setting in, and off, on, out or so with start, set, pause, rest, cease, stop, restart, resume, recover, rehabilitate or so. Let us call and define them as "Resulting verbs"(as ✴5)

( For the time being at these categorizing intention, by the way, these categorization means only at not taking transitive and intransitive distinction or discrimination into account so precisely.)

At the matter of fact, each is mutually very overwrapped and crossed so partially, otherwise replaceable to each other  nevertheless these categprozational intention has so wise signification at least to me, now I can have confidence so far.

In fact, ✴1 and ✴2 could be mentally had, thought, in mind so personaly. Thereby "want" could be included both to ✴1 and ✴2.  And necessarily these verbs must work or contribute mentally mind's internal thinking and having idea, at either regarding properness or not as clue to have dialogue or showing opinion e.g. at confference or so. That regarded functonal role must mean Paul Recoel's two main definition's 🌟personal Identity, as we usually consider at own mind for assessing which any mentioned verbs could be commonsense or seemed so standard in judging any socially appropriate usage or not.
That speculating must mean our group ordered social membership's consciousness and its ethically meant it. Thus, as a principle we can find so easily, these considrable speculation mean very cognitively time systematically jumping presumption at proposing future's deployment at trying to speak or mention(necessarily, its discerning intention could be applied either to acting with acting meant verb's usage).

Eventually, these verb's could be realized first with using say, tell, speak, talk at ✴3's embodiment. And these embodied condition could be done possibly at taking what we've(or we'd) thought previously at a view as just Recoer's regarding and defining Selfhood must be used at our meta-cognition of ✴1 and ✴ in usage on mind, not spoken phase in mind, so personally.

Today, additionally left thins now I try to mention is next recognition.
Mainly so generally frequently used ✴2 verbs must have next nature.

Thinking things as thought ideas, with the same as imagined ideas, beleived ideas or so all belong to 🌟Selfhood, because these included all ideas are just plainly very completely identified only for each our "myself". 
However if they all once are replaced with really done discription by us, as words, memorandum or so, they as soon as possibly swtiched to very objectively regarded, thereby, that nature must be swtiched to Ricouer's mentioning 🌟personal Identity.

That conversion, or to say our unconcsiously done daily act's impact must make us another phase of mind holding term's nature as our necessarily demanded definitive interpretation.

The kind of regarded as personal Identity dragging to us as our mind accompanying verb's applying usage on our mind is ver remarkable our usage's nature toward otherwise in the term of our understanding at our facing or confronting mind's disposition or intentional idea's heading disposition. Those are the verbs belong to  ✴1 and ✴2 and their essential nature, and with those, we could make us advance to ✴3's phase.

Meanwhile, Resulting verbs as functioning to result signifying must work and have functioning usually and at almost occasion consistently used only for very obejectively regarded as well as transitive verbs' basic functioning.

Today, this analysis is concluded once, and at next time as Part11, I'd like address with this time first appearing these two things with 🌟Selfhood and 🌟personal Identity, these things making gap and mutual converting function at analyzing each role and mutual relevance, so precisely.
(to be continued)

July. 7th.    2021