Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Our Modifying Mentioning is Universally Relative Part1 For Understanding "Another Dimension" Part2

This series is for understanding series "Another Dimension".


This time I'll try to explain what I call another dimension and it means our reality's normally and usually, generally aspect. To it, I'll use adjective "bright" and "dark".


If we perfectly define truly meant bright, that as at least ”bright” probably is what anybody could confirm at the color of the sky confirmed from the ground under the equatorial midday sun sunshine.
Next, toward it, truly meant dark, that is probably is what anybody could confirm at least at the color of the ground confirmed by staying one at heavy dense jungle or it midst desert or so.
Then, necessarily, these two brightness's degree are only what we can define bright and dark, though any other degree given brightness is strictly speaking never bright nor dark.


Thereby, usually when we use two adjectives, we could use them at relatively given degree at supposed one mentioning by someone, if at our usual general communication, we regard that adjective usage at meaning, at focused and indicated proposition, we just relatively judge some place's brightness according to speakers' commonsense mutually known to them.
Though, essentially, absolute judgement could be premitted to use here, only former explained two things with the brightest in this earth and the darkest in it.


Hence, consequently, we only use bright and dark at daily conversation only according to relative judgement along with conversation content.


Necessarily, according to these context at this logical understanding, we could say that almost cased at using adjectives could be configurated as supposed condition indicates us how we should judge and use at this case which bright and dark, in other words, conversation content and according to its subjective degree, we at each occasion discern bright and dark.


Therefore, eventually only bright and dark as absolutely undeniable bright and dark must be like I mentioned before, and other all usage of bright and dark must be just relatively judged mention or mentioning to us.
With those all conditions, in conclusion, almost used two adjective are never absolute brightness nor absolute darkness, thus necessarily, except these two, all our usage around bright and dark are all not completed nor perfection at realized condition.
And consequently only these domain is the largest, then that nature to be used for relatively mentioning must be "Mindful Contact" as NSZU(“Largest, but Unidentified nor Not Signified Zone to Us”), and what we use at expressing bright and dark is almot only that the largest zone to us.


With comprehending to this article's claim and content, I think anybody who reads my article as "Another Dimension" Part2, could be understood by you all at what I wanted to tell you all at that essay.


(to be continued)




Aug. 25th.    2021