Any idea could be converged with socially necessary publicity.
In other words, only abstaining from infinitely subjective arguement is consistently only credible deal for anyone, so in general. Because individual subjectivity must be the thing in which nobody could accept, eventually, what we regard so appropriate means us the publicly recognizable value.

At this view, how we can create so effective and even very unique some conssessive best method and smart compromise.

Eventually, already just at the fact we all use words as language activity, our ultimate norm as human-being must rely on claiming the superiority to procedure.( That idea was done at Paul Ricœur as in SOI-MÊME COMME UN AUTRE as the 8th study).

In other words, our individually accompanying own signification and subjective evaluation are anytime at the object we must control.

Because if we open the possibility around arguing about true justice, our social interlocked stability must be broken quicly.
E.g. standard of beauty for any individual should be taken only personally precious value, at inner mind then, we always must discern these subjective values or aethetics and publicly subjective proposition.

Our labor issue, livelihood issue or so are anytime measured at very expediently shared criterion.
If we deepen these properness so passionately, any advancement could be squashed with that barren dispute at debating.

In terms of this justice, our society is very only mechanical one gigantic machine.

At the matter of fact, at these propositional schemes, we must admit that socially fixed ideas or so with nation's politically seen proper form with capitalism and communisim or socialism is not so worthwhile at regarding top priority. Only dealing with democratic pertinence in embodiment should be seen so essential.

At the matter of fact, our brain's language thinking mode must head for that intended idea.

In other words, generalization could be interpreted with our abstention to whole so unsolvable proposition.
Consequently, probably to anybody, how we can keep up with our own stable happiness,
as much as for preserving private value pursuing.
(to be continued)

Sep. 18th.      2021

Memorandum; Any type of economics, politics, all societies must have somewhat unevenness, and this fact could never be solved so completely. All debates must start with that premise, in other words, at this premise, we must be able to solve unevenness with so a little progress. Necessarily, at our aim, it should be done maximally, in other words according to our aimed principle, as much as possible, we must minimize loss each case’s solution could output, and at that site, we’d find out some so effective scheme for allocation of the wealth.