What our whole body physically gets and what our mind previously has gotten through words whole our ancestors could have told are mutually gapped occasionally, necessarily they could have accord, but mutually obligedly remotely distancing occasion could not be so exceptional.

After all, very bodily intuitive tangible acceptance and intrinsically considerable understanding frequently make mutual so distanced apathy, never yet, kind of neglection.

These mutually conflicting mechanism must have contacting point with ontological cognition and epistemological it, but even it d be so partially.

In other words, we have one so definetely obvious mimd's questionable thinking, it is just that each consciously concretely done act at practical level, that either means substantial grasping and intrinsically analytical done thing to us, you know, that means essentially understanding which must have mutually so radical and tough difference, or so serious crevasse.

That fault could never be embedded so easily, also from now on. Because probably that so harsh reality must have some so integral and universally questionable something.

Otherwise, to some extent, its harsh ditch may have been our mind accompanying time's cognition and its daily habitual sensing in gap, or our recollective mind dragging own present times impression and internally grasped understandable acceptance in gap.

That issue, partially concerned with substance and notion in division bodily tangible and directly gotten sensing and mindfully introspective meditating metaphisically gotten meaning in distanced aspect to our own mind.

Probably, words, meaning, mind's daily heading disposition, otherwise, our mind catching own impression to anything are all mobilized at composing those so complicated mutually conflicting relevance.

We've learnt everything through education with learning words, language's notion and each meaning, but synchronically we've done all through very concretely bodily and physically real experiences, and necessarily all physical and materially practically those are also rationally understandable to anyone, that could be all so necessary control according to spiritually and mentally empirical, additionally either comprehensive.

In other words, anytime we stand by and face ambivalent reality.  

Thereby, now anytime includes part at memory and future at imaginable presumption, specifically noticed "this" includes "that", "these" or any plurality either.either third persons too. Not only but also anytime "I" includes "you", the same thing applicable to third persons either with singular and plural too.

Part we are noticed to means either totalized whole picture, all aspect or so either.

In other words, one notice to one thing makes synchronically another it, notice to whole totalized view in which that one notice to one thing is present.

(to be continued)

Sep. 27.,30th.   2021

Memorandum; These questionings are interacted with "how deepened or enlarged extent we should know so well or run down, otherwise learn to our mind.

All our unsolved things known so to us could reach these.

In other words, the thing must be relevant with Martin Luther's words at Holy body from church's Babylonian capativity.

"What makes us at that time we don't try to rely on only Jesus Christ's words and through it, we'd never try to know what happens there?

What makes us not satisfied with what Jesus's true body exists with a help of words power? Is necessary for us to know how God work with any form?"