PART1

First, quantity of invisible things could have the infinite extended appearance.
Nevertheless it could be the most major presence.

Nevertheless, that appearance could not be easily interpreted with obviously definitive modification.

That might have been originally our discovering only extremely visible things(e.g. bright, dark) could paradoxically make us have own previously made prejudiced or stereo-typed view autnomously created in our mind, we could say either.

Eventually, we have been using only very easily be expressed with words as seen so obviously extremely felt degree, ㎡eanwhile another all things fisrt neglected by us could be forsaken to not obvious nor not clearly discerned things, we are obliged to assess like that.

Nevertheless again, just it could have been only very streo-typed our misunderstanding or kind of dellusive fantasy or so.

Just impressively regarded so hard to be identified with one definitive words, just that judgement could have been misunderstanding for our mind as truth assessment in mind.

                                                                  PART2

Space of which nature is extraordinarily larger extent could not be easily identified, at least to us, that view was seen so necessary.

 But that view was just words' interpreting sensibility biassed judgement. And that thing could be relevant with time cognitive our thinking mode we habitually have in mind, eventually we are apt to regard only time's cognition as the easiest object for replacement to word.

Meanwhile, extremely larger extent things with to us, so inifintie space by itself could be seen so easy to express at least one word so simply, though only "huge", "larger" only these expresions could be done to us, in our daily life.
Eventually the most extended domain matters could be easily excluded at definitive one word's identifying to our reality.

Because essentially, so major extent necessary situation could be seen not appropriate for focused modification, in other words, larger extent holding spatial major levell could disturb us any focussed consciousness.

That is derived from words' nature, as definitive expediency at least to our very commonplace assessing mind. We could judge so, very roughly, and its proneness is kind of our judging mind's some finite ability.

This our mind for focusing could be defined as ONE POINT INDICATING NECESSITY.
That indication must have deepened relevance with my another series, "Spatial Epistemology, From Ontological Departure".

CONCLUSION; Toward the most major domain is suitable for defining, definition in mind.
At least to our mind, that idea could be easily made, and the thing must be quarified to be so integral propositional issue we should take in our research.

(to be continued)

Dec. 13th.      2021

Memorandum; Intuitively we could regard truly plain domain as the most extended things as some “being”‘s prototype.