Nature world must have undivided any elementally mutual relevant mechanical appearance, that nature's undeletable essence could drag another truth that we’d never neglect what we have socially totalized relationship with each class, hierarky, but simultaneously with each evenness, fundamental right, these all relevance must make us justice socially necessity needs us have and that in other words, from Adam Smith, through John Maynard Keynes to our contemporary ages, in other words, we must persue nationally profittable wealth, but that must be return to each individual, that compatiblity of both very different vector as wholly classified each role and power and that thing outputting wealth's distribution in mutual harmony.
If that necessary relevance could be neglected with so selfish doings with negatively meant cozy relationship, that bribery overshadowing society blasephemes Chirstianity's trinity. 
Though fundamentally essentially what we must abide by and observe in sincere obedience for sustaining our social justice.

And these things necessarily could be proved with our each so penetrating siginificance at usage of set theory, and in terms of ontology, 0 means substantial siginificance and 1 means our nnumerical targetted vlue's very basic it. And any other number could be deduced with 1's reason to exist in the dimension of socially substantial wealth's degree, though necessarily 0 means the survival necessary dimensional degree, that's why I claim that 0 is signified with ontological term.

Set 1　　⇨　　(0, 1, any other number except 0, 1 as 2,3,4,5....) Ontological Subsance

Set 2       ⇨        (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9....) Number Elemental Cognition

Set 1 means categorized set, as neecessarily as very basic ontological term cognitive it.
Set2 means numerically objective regard each no discriminated nature in dealing for outputting data of our profit.

In other words, these mutually very discriminated sets' recognition must derive the totalized social profit and commonwealth's profit returing to each citizen as individual unit could be dreived from our survival form's each unit's division not as necessarily as plants or so have.
Though, we are knowing that each nature's mechanism with ecosystematic order or so must never be divided to each element, but in terms of social activity, we all are not only each individually orthodox citizen right but also duty and obligation to pay tax to nation and municipality, in other words, like upper set equations, we all are synchronicall both totalized social functioning machine's part but also in terms of human right, mutually independent one citizen as the one who can claim at the citizen right toward evenness, fairness, and socially guranteed justice.

We each mutually are totalized one part's set as Set2, and simultaneously socially carnal extent, each not even class, assets, or empowering competence as Set1, that so ambivalent and multiple identified presence and at the same time, so in regard of each constitutional diffrecne in terms of physiolosy and pedigree's nature, so heterogenic presence.
Given and granted presence in terms of citizen right we are homogeneous social part and synchoronically given and granted dimensional accpeting and reacting modus ponens, we are each divided and essentially separably indipendent presence too.

Meanwhile, at the socially necessary working site, we are bound to reality of class, authority and empowered power in so harsh difference and really executing competence gap.

If these so essential difference could be described at Set1 and 2, all logics' ordinarily hidden truth for daily usage could be treated the one which must be derived from very ethically significant objective substance though as well as Christianity's trinity's each separable elemental co-existence but at the same time either so undivided nature thing.

Simply, ALL LOGIC'S TRUE MEANING AND OBJECT CONSISTS IN ETHIC'S REGARD and THAT VERY BASIC COMPOSITION MUST CONSIST OF Set1 and Set2 in CROSSING COGNITION.

This time, this years' all this series' very rough summary, though next year, moreover we should run this questioning and answering in repitition in sustaining newly generated questioning.

(to be continued to next 2022 probalby at January)

Dec. 24th.       2021

Memorandum; We should confront very many contradiction in evidencing truths in analysis of logics, though that contradictory enigmatic asking and responding in iteration could be next our advancing once adumbrating, but gradually focusing on sighted target.
Probably, we’d address to mainly our mind’s cooled down effectiveness in harsh crisis or jeopardized situation in survival with so plurally meant terms and dimensions.