There is stillness appearing only in metamorphose.

Rather what seems still could be mimicry or mimesis of what not in change, but truly extremely changing.

Everlasting could be only momentary, if it could be destined to come to an end.
On the contrary being very short-lived could be permanence.
That's not paradox not contradiction, just nature.

Point has infinity, eternity has no extent.
Point is on behalf of any presence, meantime eternity is on that of no presence.

Only these are nature, that is universal law.
Only 1 makes 0. Only 1 proves 0. Because only 1 makes itself none from the beginning.

1 means either renouncement.
If 1 could be inifinitely possible at being anything, only that nature adjoins 0.

1 and 0 could be seen radically symmetrical, nevertheless, if these could never be so similar, being by itself could never have been generated everlasting.

Turning 0 to 1 must never be at a stretch.
Even if it'd be seen so, truly very gradual. Only very micro levelled transition could be done.
And that levelled one could be only just once. If the principle could be true, any genesis could be proved.

E.g. fundamentally lasting straight line could be there, its basic nature must be very short-lived. Because it has no extent nor extention. That is never paradox, because it's derived from its nature.

Only twisted thing could be so straight at another dimension.
At this regard, any straight dimension must be twisted, because that must be derived from relativity, and that consquence is accidental straight.

But true basic does not mean so. Because very basic somewhat must be very dimly halfway.

Otherwise, it could disappear, and not done so needs another power.

Macho could be so pretty, very fragilly weakened one could be so brave.
That must be our own interpretation. That could be so normal nature.

By the way, any description with equation, formulation can never have completion, because it must include subjectivity, and that is just for our communication, and we all are incomplete, though necessarily any our heading for at creating completion means only incomletion.
And our communication is signified with its absolute premise.
Absolutely never completion nor perfection is the sole truth for any being.

Being kept or keeping only in weakened must be vigor.
On the contrary, expanding at a stretch means rather unsustained.

Plainness could be simple. Persistence could be so complicated.
Nevertheless plainness must be so penetrating and persistence could never be so.
Because plainness could have background of contemplation, on the other hand, persistence has some procrastination.

Opened infinity to us means only being sustaining there. That must be our own destined motion's mebius. Because we all are there subjectively, and that derives kind of unidentified complication. 

And only that is just mind and world in accord.
Accord is very miraculous to any being.

Dec. 26th.      2021