If we have hypothesis with suppositional possibility around 0, as equivalence to substantial quantification, is 0 could possible to assimilate itself with inifinity.

Only 0 could be regarded as capable at overspreading any substantially quantified extent.
Because it could be transperently schemed somewhat, though it could be adjusted to any substantially extendable, nevertheless, meanwhile, either 1 could be regarded as one typical substance as characterized at infinitely dividable notional substance.

If upper supposition could be still useful, 1 is just our the most convenient tool for enclosure, and only 0 could be capable to evade that object, but restrictedly only at not regarding 0 as differentiated subject, consequently only it is just none, as necessarily as ghost, though only it could never enclose any domain, nor any extent, because it must have no extent nor no quantification.

Just because of these factors, only 0 could be absolute notion or kind of the most surpassable object, we'd never do it so easily, because any of us must be 1 as independent presence which could have enclosurable scheming, but simultaneously we are never capable at taking our presence like ghost or so.

If we are forgiven to use so cheaper allegory like cheap fairy tale or so, we all are just tiny enclosing small substance, only 1 could be applied at usage of our substance's indentifiable subject for us, but 0 could never done so like 1.
Because only 0 must be exceptionally used substance. In other words, only it could be substance and nothing as perfection at being absent, or substantial essence to define absence.

To us, at least pratical dimension, only 0 could never be capable at enclosing anything.
Nevertheless, either 0 must belong to number substance at line.

Though, here one so penetrating questionable proposition could be submitted to us, that is "what we can regard line".

Line is at least in regard of nature world not substance but form for comprehending any phenomenal linear formed mass action or nature phenomena.
E.g. ants' line in moving, or so.

Thereby, necessarily not substantial subject could be equivalent with spitirual somewhat, and that could be hardly quantified. Because what could be done so is restricted by only what we use only for analyisis. Analyzing objectively schemed thing must be notionally and essential nature regarded one abstracted element. That is just one refined but only expediently practical criterion.
At this regard, either 1 could be so, as well as 0, because it just means enclosure by itself.

Deductively, 0, 1 are notional criterion, but at background of these usage, we have so conrete reality with substantially nature scheming filling contents.

Nevertheless, we usually at deliberating and picturing in mind for some specific daily obejct and aim, must use notional criterion so frequently, there.
Though necessarily, we acknowledge our daily kind of catch ball in mind between substantial object and notionally formalized criteria at anytime we have scheming in mind.

In the end, we could define and deduce that our daily schematic consideration must need the kind of catchball between substance and formalized notion, in grasping our objective correctness for carrying out something so necessary.

Nevertheless, we certainly have some not clearized but attending kind of intuitively absolutely correct assessing, we know that any concreted action and really moblizable emobodiment must be based on any kind of formalized and notionally evidenced correct mind in terms of spiritually acknowlegeable judging, in daily life.

In other words, we through enclosure of 1 and not that doing in 0, have any decision and acting and executing comanding to ourselves for some schemed object or targetted criterion.

(to be continued)

Dec. 30th.      2021