Our body’s presence and any other concreted ones as materialized substance must have own restricted condition, that is just not dividable at identical unit even with ameba, that nature’s precision preciseness of reproductive identicality is only presicion’s degree in the best performance as product by nature selection.

In other words, fandamentally, any substance could never be replaced with each identity, as in terms of material, each thing is another to each other.
That absolutely restricted condtion is universally distributed, daringly to say, either divided, but latter meaning only the same nature condition as ameba are, not really identical, then we with all materials are never dividable, reproduced lizard’s tail is certainly componential nature in identicalness, but that substantial it is completely another as one reproduced it.

This irreplaceable and irretrievable nature is spatially conditioned and simultaneously time conditioned example.
In other words, the same thing as identical thing is just only one, and never replaceable, though it could never stay at mutually another two locations t the same time.

These serially evidential processes must be replaced with next formulated order.

✹Space’s one so typical nature consists in that one located coginitively confrimable situation must never have indentical it at another location, because if it’d be possible, time’s order must have confused contradiction.

BECAUSE, TIME’S RUNNING AT ANY DATE PASSING CONDITION IS JUST ONCE AND NEVER (doing) AGAIN.

UPPER BASIC NATURE MUST BE FRINGED WITH THE IDENTICAL THING COULD BE LOCATED SIMULTANEOUSLY AT PLURAL LOCATIONS.

On the contrary, if that as identical thing simultaneously present at two or more plural locations, time’s system must be crossed with another current, but actually that could be possible only at our brain’s imaginary picturing and substantially that must be absoultely impossible.

And these evidencing process by itself could evidence also that LOGICALLY CONTRADICTORY THING MUST NEVER COME UP TO AT REAL PHYSICAL WORLD.

AND THAT TRUTH MUST SUGGEST or even if we take more inactive and modest attitude, at least, IMPLIES that LOGICAL EVIDENCING MUST NEVER BE ONLY EXPEDIENTLY DONE METHOD, never yet, THAT MUST ADHERE TO PHYSICAL LAW(as physics’ principle).

By the way, additionally I’d like to mention that we all are never yet known to all physically and logically both extents’ more credible and absolutely trustworthy principle.
Though, just only we are come and go around time and space in cyclic logical extensive proving, nevertheless, truly we are never known to precise truth of time and space.
Exactly partially, we’d gotten the assets from Albert Einstein as his Special relativity or so,
but at so high degree probability inclined criterion, more specifically another discovered method, ”The simultaneous impossibility of these two things” may be provable, with a more stable concept and substantive understanding of a level that transcends time and space that can be demonstrated.
Now expediently why don’t we define that suppositional thing as U( space’s s, time’s t, and another as u)? From next occasion of debating this theme on, this U will be used for it.

(to be continued)

Dec. 30th. 2021