There are two ways of life. Someone who follows someone and someone who lets many others follow you. Putin's aides are the former, Putin is the latter. Mr Putin is from the KGB, but what kind of young man was he at the time of joining the station? It would have been quiet, but it would have been a favorite type (as was the face when he was young). I'm good at calculations, but I think it was attractive.

There are two types of freedom. One is the freedom to criticize Putin and Xi Jinping as dictators, and the other is the freedom to analyze what can be a dictator. You have the freedom to argue against anything and wear the mask of justice only by criticizing others, and the freedom to calmly analyze the secrets of success to those who are great, whether they are dictators or whatever.

In general, the freedom felt by those who were born into wealthy people and have not been crippled by money, and the freedom felt by those who have been poor and crippled by money since childhood, are completely different worlds. If that law were correct, the outlook on love, the outlook on marriage, and the sense of happiness would still be decisively separated from each other. It becomes a literary theme in itself.

Being close to each other personally is not a good thing. At least in a fair society. But pursuing that justice, in turn, creates an ideal that sacrifices all of your personal feelings of well-being. The abandonment of family happiness promises the prosperity of profitable offspring. Socialists actually give up on both. Liberals, on the other hand, try to find a compromise.

In an era when only publications were publicly guaranteed freedom of speech, one's thoughts would not be recorded unless they were published. But now it's different. Rather, if a book does not sell, it will be discontinued immediately even if it hits once, but writing on the net is not so. Therefore, basically, the modern Internet society keeps a record of all unnecessary things.

Jan. 30th.     2022