This time, I'd like to show each notional confirmation around signified conceptual structure.

This time, I'd assress to mainly, essence, substance, material, structure, phenomenon, relevance, relation, content, element, part, all(whole), nature, meaning, feature, constitution.

From the beginning, we have mutually very differentiated ideas simultaneously in mind, and to the truth anybody is conscious about having attention at telling something to anyone.

"Essence" means somewhat objectively regarded otherwise so introspectively interpretable our mind function and work outputting judgement.

"Substance" means somewhat almost the same with essence, however, "essence" must be used at anytime and very constantly never differently meaning, but substance inclines more materialistic and so completely objectively regarded than essence.
Because essence could be used either for our mind attached emotionally, psychlogically and mentally regarded assessing occasion.

"Phenomenon" means just emobodied some reallly confirmable things, though essence is just anonym toward it.
Toward it "structure" means more systematically composed aspect and mechanically functional condition and its description is submitted there. "Structure" must indicate some practically made covered cognition as some totalized systematic interpretation.

Meanwhile, "material" means really practically found and touched any concrete matter, from scientific category to data filed stock, in library, archive, or so.

"Relevance" means more rougher and arbitrary bond, joint at mutual distance, though to some extent, actually similar with "reciprocity".
On the other hand, "relation" means more stronger bond and joint spiritually, materially.

"Content" means very objectively and concretely, and matetially regarded rough structural elemental appearance, toward it, "element" means more analytically ouputted nature's appearance.

Toward them, "part" must mean more rougher but either more absolutely arbitrarily dividably cognitive element, though universally it means so simply.
Toward "part", necessarily "all(whole)" must be confronted toward "part" as anonym of it, in expressing comprehensive view, and totalized summed up indication.

                                      

                                                    PAUSE

″Nature” ”meaning”, ”feature”, ”constitution”.

First, ″nature” and ”feature” are probably almost used as the same in dialogue or conversation context.  Just ”feature” means noticeable character, toward it, nature” is more wide range applicable and roughly indicated in meaning character. Against it, "meaning" must indicate functioning working content by itself. And that meaning's totalized concept as introspectively told whole appearance must be  ”constitution”.

Nevertheless, at almost cases, probably ”meaning” and  ”constitution” could be replaced with each other, just former is outcome indicative term, but latter is more concretely indicated substantial term. Only the difference must be laid between them.

In other words, "nature" means more externally displayed appearance, toward it, ”feature” is on a basis of it and more our shared notice and subjectively approachably contacted stance attending. Against it,  ”constitution” is more abstractly objective, and introspectively mentioned it.

At next chance to address to these questionable this time not mentioned content and more detached interpretation will be done.

(Irregularly to be continued)

May. 15th.    2022