At the matter of fact, I was heard that woman thing must have very assorted faces according to each facing people.

The one who said so was one jazz club owner as female one.

By the way, her claiming truth could mean that after all, that kind of woman has only one never switchable conviction, though at any different idea attending one's conversation she has to take part in, she needs to make her ideas irreplaceable around facing any person.Though necessarily, she must be never flexible nature woman.

Meanwhile, if to anyone, only no converted ideas could be displayed, the one must have at each occasion change the reaction made by her.

After all, the one who discerns attitudes to each one in flexibly changing attitude could never convert the one's idea according to facing each one.

Thereby, necessarily, the one who resists the one's remark's objectionable opinion holder must have some crashing objectionable moments at any hostile ideas' holding one's conversation.

Though, the one must never deal with commerce, negotiation, and business concern jobs, so rationally.

And she as jazz club owner has not liking unnecessary debate to anyone at least at her business, though, she must take her attitude to anyone in avoiding any unnecessary crash and collision.

On the other hands, the one who can have an idea that occasionally collision could not be useless, though the one has some confident idea that developpable and progressed change in collision must never always useless.

The one who has tie idea that according to each facing one's own character human should change the attitude, though the one at least at dimension of contacting people, only formally taken attitude must be the best, at no showing any true minded ideas to anybody hiding any subjective remark, though the one is very arbitrarily businesslike one, meanwhile, another not showing converted attitude one must be the one who could never flatter anybody according to each different idea's facing.

Just nevertheless, even if we could for the present admit upper my showing truth, so stark, how we can discriminate each one's categorized those typed differences.

Because otherwise, at the one whose attitude must be honestly not arbitrarily changing could pretend so as giving impression that the one is honest at not flattering to the conversation partner at that occasion.

Though, essentially, to anybody, probably we'd never pretend to be absolutely honest nor dishonest.

In conclusion, we must never be showing any absolutely honesty to anyone as necessarily we are never be so pure minded to anyone whom is faced by us, and never be showing any absolute dishonest as necessarily pretending attitude showing as mutually implicit social courtesy's premise.

Consequently, constantly, we are never be purely honest except each "myself's immanently no lying mind and emotion, in other words, to any other one but us as our each "myself", even if we try to be no lying honest, we'd never be absolutely purely honest at no pretending noq lying to any other one but "us" as each "myself".

(Irregularly to be continued)

July. 18th.  2022