Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Academic circle's Truly Difficult Circumstance's Substance c.

First, we need to digest that we are surviving socially own relevance and our mutually reciprocal necessity.


Though, very roughly, next digest could be submitted.


To nature embodied truth, we'd summarize like next.


①NATURE EMBODIED TRUTH ー STATISTICAL TRUTH


②STATISTICAL TRUTH ー MATHEMATICAL TRUTH


③MATHEMATICAL TRUTH ー NATURE EMBODIED TRUTH


Upper each relevant and reciprocal order is on both directions effective, not classified category at class.


Just next assumption could be effective.


① = FUNDAMENTAL NATURE SELECTIVE TRUTH


② = CONCRETION and ABSTRACTION in mutual INSPECTION and ANALYSIS


③ = FUNDAMDNTAL NATURAL SELECTIVE TRUTH's OWN DISPARITY in COGNITION


By the way, ② CAN OUTPUT "BIOMASS" TRUTH

in statistical each species' DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

And that must introduce CO2 EMISSION ISSUE's SOLUTION.

②UTILITY necessarily could be REFERRED with material by e.g. DARWIN, DAWKINS, J.GOULD, KIMURA.


❇️BIOMASS could MEAN "BIOLOGICAL NATURE's MEMORY ANALYSIS


❇️UPPER EMBODIED CLASSIFIED REGARDING is some ANALYSIS for COMPREHENSION of ECHELON


❇️NECESSARILY, UPPER ALL APPROACHES could DEMAND "TAXONOMY", "SYSTEMATOLOGY" and "MEREOLOGY"


Just PHYSICAL TRUTH and our own SUBJECTIVE MIND TRUTH to them, HOW WE ALIGN or COORDINATE both two items is VERY INTEGRAL and VITAL.


Because both things with "TAXONOMY" and "SYSTEMATOLOGY", at the matter of fact, from the beginning, they essentially perform each different action.


ADDITIONALLY, even SYSTEMATOLOGY must have very ASSORTED ANALYTICAL METHOD.


WHOLE and PARTS are INTERPRETED with CLASS's DEGREE and each FUNCTIONAL DISCRIMINATION could be POSSIBLE.


DERIVED ACADEMIC STUDY could have been truly essential knowledge, and that OVERTURN could be SIMHLAR with EACH "LANGUAGE"s each BIRTH of "NATION", "CONCEPT" at USAGE.


And each ECHELON by itself is SUBSTANTIAL REJECTION to "SYNTHESIS". That interpretation is academic research's essence.


EPISTEMOLOGICAL VIEW → RATIONALLY regarded EMPIRICAL NOTIONALLY, IDEALLY DONE "SYNTHESIS.


At these procedural approaches, necessarily, NOMEN CLATURE must be NECESSARY.


Because, ULTIWATELY, "NOMINAL ANALYSIS and PRECISE CHECK means Our Action's INTROPECTIVE REVIEWING.


(Irregularly to be continued)


July13, 14th., 28th.   2022


Appendix; A t next occasion to analyze in debatable approach, we could meet the chance to take "RESEARCHERS' NECESSITY to re-check ORGANIZATION and MEMBERSHIP around research-based execution.


At this interpretation, again, NOMEN-CLATURE will be NECESSARY.