Now I want to premise that we are ordinarily have a mind to regard our own subjective idea and conviction as only personally seen appropriate or correctly right mindset and own belief. 

However, society relevantly attached necessity abiding idea is apt to guide our daily action to follow only socially fixed conventionally generally attached following suit in no considerable inspecting mind.

That lazy inertia sustainable our harmonizing attitude and socially taken behavior but substantially is prone to make our truth abiding justice thought so dissatisfied at our own introspection afterware we have our own time personally.

Luther's my constantly applying text's subsequentwpart sentences' content is definitely showing us his idea that in our own contemporary philosophical idea reference as what we use empirically significant "Epistemology" means some containing idea around ethics, and Ontology is not that intended idea applicable with the reference, but rather it's contrarily another and that counter idea that rather Ontology by itself must contain that ethics and its idea attending own thought abiding stance must be probably so appropriate.

And Epistemology means merely inspecting our mind's own nature measuring and comfirming objective thought and idea fixing mode.

And rather Ontology can make our mind carried to our own birth and death and these factual interpreting must need not just objectively regarded own analytical mind rather very subjectively introspective and comprehensive idea as very abstractly arbitrarily attending our mind. In other words, Ontology means rather metaphysically inspecting around our ethologically significant own time system abiding own abstract idea. And rather only concretely practical ideas are belonging to pragmatically significant analytical mind.

In other words, Epistemology means not directly ethnically necessary idea, but objectively scientific necessity to us.

E.g. these all mentioned ideas could be given a chance to that fact's own mechanism, subjective introspective inspection as analytical posture abiding must match with scientific objectivism and rather Ontology abiding must match with very abstractly metaphysical and not practically theological God presence abiding our own mind's proposition.

At these factors, Luther's criticizing objective Church's high class clergymen's corruption and decay means rather Ontological view's losing in only following social suit, though, scientific objectively abstract interpreting means more notionally formal as the suit, though rather Epistemologic, meanwhile, Ontological viewing to us as birth to the world and lifetime spending and death means very ethically practically schematic introspection. That introspecting is very socially necessity attached idea. On the other hand, Epistemological idea abiding objectivity with scientific objective analysis is ordinarily not ethically metaphysical, rather merely physical.

Though, Ontology means very suajectively rather immanent. Because Ontology means very introspective view's adoption. Taking into account those cognitive recognition, we can read next( 26's subsequent part's) description by Luther can be read and interpreted as so OUR MIND'S OWN ETHICALLY NECESSARY CHRISTIANITY'S MINDSET WE NEED TO KEEP IN MIND.

"Second, the Pope on the contrary to that, at not at married life (as having no carnally sexual relationship) one person against the partner's will could enter into abby life, married life will be canceled, that was ordered. I'd like to ask. What kind of Satan told it to them? God through Isaiha criticizes stealing with the premise to dedicate holocaust. Spouse toward other one according to promise has to be obedient to it. Mutually each is not independently owning the one. Any power could never demolish it. Executing it against the other one's will or intention is stealing by the one's arbitrary power no matter what circumstance could be there. How can anybody welcome the one in forgiving the one's sin as the reason to free the one's sin at permitting the breaking rule as promise? Blind ones, blind ones, which is important between promise ordered by God and human creating pleading?

The Pope, are you truly Soul's ranch hand? Are you who teach that thing the saint theology teacher? I f you say so, with what reason do yot do in teaching? You claim that pleading is highly respectful action than marriage. But only believing enhances all things. However, you praise karmba than belief, don't you? Karma is powerless at least in front of God. If you paraphrase it achievement, that'd be the same."

          

                      ❇️      ❇️      ❇️      ❇️      ❇️

Here, we are at the chance to refer Michael H enri's text in question as "INCARNATION" again.

"In current, any anti-current tip could never appear."

"No longer not that "Now's consciousness" is just provider of existential impression, rather existential impression makes us "Now"."

"(Omission) that unexpectedly spooky nature given to us, otherwise, with its that nature, negative ghost's supposition including decisiveness is making the point in front of us one specific emerging of one possible notion ー in other words, one visualization thereby every visualization consequently also view as viewing sensing is just fake as the possibility. That kind possibility once comes up to us, any visualization could never exclude any other it neither. Because actually visualization is wrong and at that field which any possibility is never realized, because there must be possible at changing our watchable things by our visual sensing so exactly."

"Method" is this same thinking of intention and "object" is this the same thinking of intention, "Cogitatio" and this "Cogitatio's appearance is both obviously analytically perception abiding, reduced to obvious and clarified perception. "Adequatio rei et intellectus", in other words, equivalence to object at perceiving (cognition) must find out Socrates tasty deepened nature. Thinking and being is equivalent with each other."

And left all sentences indicating significance means so Ontological as I try to display at referring. Its signified nature is ordinarily replaced with Thaumazein as philosophical rejoice at intellectual quest's originarily attending as traditional Greek notion.

"Every image is embodied there as its world's on IMAGO means image has each own feature, e.g. it's one COGITATIO's image, and the thing is never easily interpreted. "

"(Omission)Intention is accepted so obvious as we know world's appearing aspect is never making another appearing in introducing. Far from it, on the contrary, in qualifications of externally felt object, any in our empirical coming up thing is done to watch by intention, and to feel are consequently in world's detachment, these kinds of everything is swinging and echoing in one world."

"In the mode that every flesh by itself experiences, in our own flesh, experiencing, as the kind of along one alive transcendental theory abiding "myself", made advent, it's given birth. Though birth meaning thing is as simply imagined, one it never means body attending "body-object" as philosophical object formally made advent. Because at the case, any alive individual body could never exist, the conclusion is deducted, being at least is materials' appearance, inner world nature attending materials' appearance which submits world's several laws."

And consequently I want to indicate that Luther's upper quoted parts' claiming summary means those very metaphysically Ontologically schemed interpreting around his claiming seen correct belief around being Christian. 

It's not directly relevant with upper meant thing, but the same Phenomenology philosopher, Maurice Melreau Ponty describes at his "HUMANISTE ET TERREUR"

"We must be habitual at regarding as what we've collected our given things from anywhere. Evidencing is only what actually we'd never do except confirming. Evidencing true significance is making inference ideas induced at perfectly differentiated action toward inference ideas. Evidencing is not abled at comprehending totally, proof by itself is e.g. describing action which is not equivalent with myself so precisely, arranging these actions."

Those all I quoted is derived from that to us, "believable religious creed abiding idea must be at least to own mind as "myself" to each of us so genuinely immanent and that subjectivity means that especially any belief could never be replaced with any expediently prepared convenience. That doesn't mean that convenience is not useful, but means that originally to us, believing mind expressed at least at upper Luther's description means just MERELY "SUBJECTIVELY MADE ADVENT".

To some extent, we can paraphrase that to us any objective quoted idea is the only what we can use as some easy introspection. Meanwhile to us, what to believe subjectively is only what we can never use any convenient tool. Because that usage only signifies our referring necessity. But essentially, that quoting means only at some irreplaceable our own subjective idea. 

At least at my quoting part of Luther's text, he must claim only the thing. And in final, our mind issue is always deduced at the the indication. Because to us, intrinsically belief is never what we'd be obliged to attend through recommendations or pressure made from social site not relevant with our immanence so at externally meeting. Even if we could meet any religiously believable idea from accidentally meeting thing in our daily event, after all we'd have some strong mind for accepting that meeting. Because if we had no that immanently necessary idea, we'd never have that meeting.

Though this time's Luther's mentioning thing is identified at the harsh criticism to the Pope and churches, with background idea as he thought that they are only unnecessarily cling on to Epistemologically reasoned idea, but truly significantly what we should keep on mind is the only subjectivity abiding mind.

Thereby, his preaching idea Luther must have defined there is to us religious mind must be merely what comes from our immanent Idea or mind, though the thing is consequently necessarily becoming "ONTOLOGICALLY GIVEN" nature. Only the claim is done by him. To me, that appearance can be judged at the part.

(Irregularly continued)

Jan. 7th.    2023