Ⅲ's summary was we have no constant true mind, rather at our necessary negotiable occasion, we arbitrarily are interpreted true mind of us by negotiating partner. In other words, true mind is arbitrarily made through our negotiating table for seeking after mutually the most advantageous consensus.

Though intrinsically somehow fixed true mind is not exactly prepared for any communication partner, rather at mutually profitable approachable inquiry, mutually at each negotiable phase, true mind is to partner, we interpret own true mind, though essentially, true mind is rather at being interpreted by partner, necessarily is arbitrarily made at reacting attitude or negotiating stance by partner. Though true mind is rather so passively made our reply abiding response.

And that essential mind's nature is, according to mutual communicative necessity, very arbitrarily convertible either according to our own situation we are personally besieged or circumstance we're obliged to attend, through true mind is constantly very arbitrarily interpreted by any partner. Though "TRUE MIND" is COMMUNICATIVE MUTUALLY STRATEGIC INTERPRETED NOTION made in situation and circumstance of communication. Though that identity is not universally fixed mindset nor stably unchanged nor stiffly put value, but very fluctuated controversial mutually advantageous outcome following questing.

And necessarily, that applicable extent or realizably measurable value is very alternative or very flexibly made instant compromisable solution deriving otherwise temporarily solvable appearance. 

Thus, that applicable range is essentially extended written and made file, made paper, record at archives or so can be applied too.

At these analysis, our communication through words with talking and sentences composing are totally very OUR SOCIALLY SITUATION and LOCALLY GEOGRAPHICAL CIRCUMSTANCED with AGES' TREND or TOPICALLY POLITICAL TERM'S ARBITRATION.

Though in fact, true mind is fundamentally different from RELIGIOUS CONVERSION or LIFETIME BELIEF or so.

Necessarily, true minds accumulated outcome occasionally makes own belief or religious credo or believable creed or so, none the less, these immanently intrinsic idea as philosophy can be exceptionally transcendent or transperently exceptional, we could conclude so either.

To us, for surviving our own necessarily demanded conditioned life appearance, we occasionally use true mind so arbitrarily and very exceptionally once or twice we could have rather illegally transcendental reasoned switching at accompanying own idea as life belief or creed.

Because our life is never previously scheduled nor intentionally strictly schemed so constantly, far from it, partially very constantly stably accompanying ideas or stances are recognizable, but essentially at any lifetime running phase or aspect, we constantly move our own mind. And we are, in spite of the truth, simultaneously some identified and consistently identical mindset or arbitrarily made decision or the pattern of making up of our mind must be given in our own mind too.

(Irregularly continued)

Jan. 26th.   2023