I dare to critcize any democratic idea's justice abiding fairness and equality as regarding so incomplete index.

FIRST, "EQUALITY and FAIRNESS absolutely NEGLECT ANY OWN THING'S DIFFERENCES, NECESSARILY, HUMAN RIGHT SHOULD BE EQUALITY at RECEIVING.

NEVERTHELESS, ORDINARILY, ANY INDIVIDUAL THING is ABSOLUTELY DIFFERENTIATED, though to it, DARINGLY REGARDING WHOLE THINGS AS EQUAL is ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT.

HUMAN RIGHT EQUALITY and EACH INDIVIDUAL NATURE and EACH EQUALITY are OCCASIONALLY COMPATIBLE but NOT THAT, INCOMPATIBLE OCCASION is absolutely given to us.

Though, WHEN WE SHOULD APPLY EQUALITY and FAIRNESS should be APPLIED or NOT must be CAREFULLY ANALYZED and REINTERPRETED so CAREFULLY.

Originally, INTRINSICALLY, HUMAN thing is BASED on EACH FAVOR is DEFINITELY DIVIDED. We should ONCE GO BACK to THAT DEFINITELY UNDENIABLE TRUTH.

NEGLECTING it MUST BE ONE of TOTALITARIANISM.

In other words, WEST CAMPS own LIBERALISM and COMMUNISM's EQUALITY should be DISCERNED.

COMMUNISM and BUREAUCLATISM's EQUALITY and CAPITALISM COMBINED with DEMOCLACY's EQUALITY are MUTUALLY DIFFERENT.

INDIVIDUALLY, INDIVISUALISM and EQUALITY or FAIRNESS are ORIGINALLY, INTRINSICALLY IMCOMPATIBLE and MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY.

(IRREGULARLY CONTINUED)

Mar. 11th.    2023