Around ②, this time, undigested intrinsic enement was confirmed at my mind, I'd address to it again.

To us, obviously not solvable nature is easiy comprehended in our personal mind. And that case tells us that we should have epoche as judgement ceasing.
That convincing reason is like next.

In general, being lazy is not positively regarded attitude we can easily admit, but that falls under the mindset we must keep when we have to do in no questionable case we have to execute or practice.
But actually, we have another case that we are in no obviously credible conviction around what we should do, and that occasion rather tells us that epoche is applicable at dealing with making up our mind around what to do next for us, so effectively.

And obviously, not having strict conviction around what we face is definitely the case some personally not obviously found at doing without sure confidence as being losing a way for advancing, we certainly have to admit that we are straying. Though the case tells us that we should apply the view around that uncertain matter in question for evading moreover confusion dominant situation. Next mindset must be outputted.

1️⃣ To us, unmanageable thing, we should not have definitive interpretation around that identified nature.
Though, it must be what we should not have definitive mind around interpreting.
If we define that situation is merely indefinite, let's make it IND.
2️⃣ To IND, we obviously should not have clarified view and we should admit our questionable mind toward it as if knowing cound be KN, 

KN (IND) = NO DANGER, 

And, for evading having mind to know so well unidentified matter, and that must be having clarified definition, that could be identified and to not that thing, what we have clarifying mind is nonsense.

Though, 

KN (IND) =￢ {￢ KN(IND)}, 

First (IND) means our mind's laziness, though being lazy means knowing indefinite matter.

Though, if being lazy is LZ,

KN (IND) = LZ,

And necessarily, knowing it so well means having very focused mind and if it'd be FC.M, 

￢FC.M =LZ, 

Though, 

For evading our own misunderstanding we should previously have abandonment around definition toward uncertainty, that'd be, if our evading circuit option could be EV/C, 

KN (IND) = EV/C{ ￢{KN(IDN)} }

We in general, toward any lazy attitude, shouldn't deny, far from it to it, we should evaluate as what we have an abilhty around regarding "uncertainty" as so unfocused as watching it lazily.

Though,

￢FC.M= LZ as our mind in the situation is positively regarded.

Because 

FC.M ⊃EV/C{ ￢{KN(IDN)｝｝

Though, we should have mindset as KN(IND)=NO DANGER.

(IRREGULARLY CONTINUED)

May. 23rd.    2023