If hotness has own mind, that'd be some focused own exciting one, isn't it?

On the other hand, if coldness has own mind, that'd be some so small fixed, on the contrary to hotness, extremely excluded exciting emotion abiding own reason cold state, isn't it?

Temperature makes people own mind room for contacting some specified materialistic reaction. But intrinsically, for each temperature by itself, how the temperature could be sensed by itself? Itself can feel, be tangible by itself, how is the sensibly felt by itself?

Necessarily, all those suppositive question can be composed by the question " Is temperature by itself attending own mind or not?"

Necessarily, that'd be unidentified to our mind, sensing tangibility as our own mind. But its suppositive temperature's own heat and cold own sesnsing mind by itself is never denied so definitely, and if that could be denied, our own sensing tangible mind can be diffused. 

But how can you interpret those questioning proposal?

To my proposing own questioning can be equipped some very integral proposition or not. That'll be some touchstone around our knowing sensing mind between our body in sensing mind and ordinary materials. 

Temperature is only phenomenon, how can we define that its questioning is only mistifying cheetable proposition? If we are never do, that seen strange questioning must not be denied as tiny illusion our mind makes so definitely?

(Irregularly continued)

Aug. 23rd.   2023