At starting anything, after all, we won't do everything even if we'd survive very long years, only the detached idea could be by ourselves.

Though, on the contrary, even if we can talk only "being", in it, to some probable extent, everything already can be premised from the beginning. 

Because to us, being means definitely in any time running, otherwise in simply not quoted only serially running time, we do anything and have any idea, the running appearance can be defined our own lifetime, necessarily, time running, recollective our mind or do in constant time advancing securing and evidencing steady change to any identity, though necessarily, being means time conveying everything as the proof of any being thing, and each personally cognitive mind means being in time, time in being.

Additionally, being by itself can be cognotively noticed at own self which means I as first person, and to my thing, as me, any facing one is second person, and in us with you and me as first and second person in us with I and you makes own another person, objective presence in human being as third person which makes us the representatively typical other one in human world cognition, as stranger's first definition. 

In you and me, any stranger seems to be indifferent to us, so definitely and obviously, because from the beginning, with the premise around any third person as indifferent and familiar to us, as familiarity makes us third person unfamiliar as definitive necessary direction optional mentioning makes us the third person in unfamiliarity objective analyzable object.

In other words, the combination with you and me makes us the first objectively seemed own indifferently unfamiliar one as their person made to first object for us, though only through me as first person, never told any third person, because with the absolute premise as you and me in us given to us, for the first time, objectively him, her, them could be told as given an occasion for talking other one and ones as first objective one and ones.

And that objectivity must never be the same around only my sense through I, beforehand meeting some you as second person as plainly my body sensed only this me, true objectivity as a notion must never be made, because rare objectivity means absolute subjective the third objectivity, though necessarily that and my subjective mind have no border, but with you as second presence in talking to each other, for the first time, true cognitive objectivity's cool and detached only objective him, her, and them could come up to our own mind. 

Those directly upper mentioned logic means origin of any jurisprudential social mechanical identity in purely seemed objectivity. Rare objectively cognitive third person does never include any objective words, but in involved with our own language communication, for the first time, very indifferently regarded own objective third person can be set and composed in the context of language activity abiding sentences deriving order. 

Though as long as our social order sustains our language activity, after once saying being, alteady its doing includes own our presence cognition and serially told you as the premise of dialogue partner and for us as the first appeared presence, third objectively told one's presence can be derived so necessarily.

In those all serially made current, world by itself, being by itself and meaning of "together" comes up to our mind in taking own myself as my idea as thinking.

(Irregularly continued)

Aug. 25th.    2023

Appendix; Every notion is the mother for any other notion, and each is the child and parent to any other notion to each other, though world by itself, time, nothing in being will be relatively universally collateral presence as one meant and signified in identified unit, though one is absolutely single unit, totalled wholeness and partially definitive element simultaneously or so at a stretch made divided in destiny.