To us, some anxious item around necessity for checking, e.g. at any security one, we usually have some very contrary conditioned outcome against what we need necessarily, in other words, checking means more positively relatively better more than worst result we can regard, the typed own in picturing the worst condition, than it, we can regard better or not, that relative comparaison must be mobilized. 

In other words, when we assess what we were doing, checking that it was never the worst we can regard, in other words, not that worst than truly worst outcome, that typed inactive judgement possible condition, for the present we can admit that it could not at least be the worst, that inactive judgement is the most basic minimal assessable condition. 

After all, only doubled negation must be the minimally positively assessable condition, that idea is surely potentially equipping in our own mind.  What makes us so must be caused from that we are never having more appropriate formally precise method for evading the maximal error or so the worst failure.

In other words, confirming something is correct can be done the most effectively by admitting the subject which we must confirm appropriately with the condition which has no error nor so ultimate false, misunderstanding, mistaken interpreting nor so. 

After all, we are the creature in which we can never confirm our own mistake, having only constantly in-eliminated anxious mind continuously, though eliminating every anxious factor must mean to us getting ease and being able to do everything in no anxiety.

Though, to us, our mind has intrinsically crisis management necessity awareness, we are the kind of creature. ¬ ¬ as double negative is equivalent with the stable and easy minded guranteed state for us.

In fact, in our daily reality, no other so specific denial executing occasion as displaying necessity is hardly be made or seen so necessarily. Because denial is the thing if we apply it to any person, as specific aimed negation makes the mutual conscientious understanding and its better relation just be demolished. Though essentially, negation must be what we should apply the minimally modified exceptional case, in any other normal case, we should not abuse it so easily, that abusing must be gotten demolishing action to any human network. 

Though, in our own society, negation is taboo, and its socially applicable cases prove that negation means ethically very grave power at human mentality. Though negation and ethical subjective view could be relevant with only at our own human relation in our own community. 

And probably, the simplest principle applicable Mathmatics by itself either has own ethical procedural necessity so intrnisically in the end. 

(Irregularly continued)

Nov.  18th.       2023