First, we can say that we feel time so longer than really it takes when we are not that well done no matter what we are doing for our own necessity, on the other hand, when our own necessity unexpectedly could be well done than we personally expected, we feel time running so shorter than really it took. 

After all, being felt time must depend on our own mentality according to each momentarily felt our own mentality. 
In other words, those all our sensitively cognitive time's own nature on the contrary proves that at least to us time must never be constantly taken as what it should take, though at least to us, time is definitely according to our own what we make time in our own mindful idea. Though necessarily, time is never the constatly strictly equally taken to any situation, though on the contrary, to us, time is never always cloud nine provisional thing nor desperately our any hope robbing rogue tasty nature thing.

In other words, who can well operate or use time must be the winner in our own world as according to what human should be as the one can survive.

Additionally, in fact, we can never prove that time must run according to absolutely correct and precisely previously given correct never any taken arbitrarily mistaking running, but only schemed doing managed by Lord as this case nature is applicable, with our own absolutely objectively measurable machine, because we can never absolutely prove that only very precisely made time measurable machine has no mistake. 
And upper those are never be "Sophistry". Rather only upper those interpretation must be the absolute truth in which any sophistry can never be inserted. 

Simply we can never prove that any seen absolutely precisely produced own o'clock must never have any measuring mistaking. One proof is it, and additionally, from the beginning, what we believe in the truth that time can run according to previously schemed by nature, Lord or so is originally one of fallacy. Even if anybody tries to overturn its truth, it must be so empty trial. Because from the beginning, we are never absolutely prove that any Lord, God scheming thing is never having any fallacy nor mistake, because we as human made by God or Lord must never be perfection, even if God or Lord must never be imperfect because He made us according to His will and intention, we are never perfection. 

In other words, certainly we are obliged to admit that our own imperfection nature, but simultaneously we are neither not only never perfection but also nor never perfectly imperfection. In other words, we either at positioned in those territory the Lord previously had schemed.

And what upper paragraph shows must mean at the matter of fact Sir Dr. Charles Darwin implicitly had tried to tell us all who are merely the people surviving (to us, contemporary world or society) posterity. 

In other words, contemporary society given us as we should regard our own surviving world should be regarded through those ideas procedural order so reasonably, unexpectedly, the kind of necessary attitude is demanded on our any doing and thinking, and it must signify that Sir. Charles Darwin had tried to tell us all, so implicitly. 
He hade never tried to not only affirmate all Bible had tried to tell us was perfectly correct, but also he had not try to tell us that Bible had tried to tell us perfectly incorrect, rather what he wanted and tried to tell us around Nature and what Bible describes are never constantly compatible nor constantly incompatible, rather he had tried to tell us never perfectly constant nor never perfectly inconstant as very ambiguous and ambivalent reality, he must have tried to tell us all through his own "the Origin of Species". 

And in fact, and actually, we all are obliged and irresistibly trying to survive own never perfect but simultaneously never imperfect world not only to us but also to any other species simultaneously. And the truth necessarily can be applied even to our human achieving anything which includes the greatest things so irresistibly and necessarily.

In frank, ultimately what human history must have achieved must be never perfection nor never imperfection simultaneously in no contradiction, we can only define so, so confidentially to any our own posterity people. 

(Irresistibly continued)

Dec. 27th.    2023

Appendix; By the way, upper those are somewhat Einstein's Relativity theory tasty nature thing around I tried to emphasize, the remark must never be error idea, but probably not that oppositionally perfectly correct idea. And the absolutely never perefctly solvable neutral zone must have some very convincing theory or principle as either in terms of Relativity theory by Einstein and the Origin of the Species by Charles Darwin.