I have no idea of ascertained conviction around statistical data check or so, but I'm never already so younger geberation one, hence a little bit also I can presume something, historically so great succsessful person could have common fact, that was some kind of very best timing must be present, of course that kind of example could never be applied to the great holly ones, but if we apply so macro view, all great ones would have crossed similsr factor to gain ground in contributing great acheivement.

E.g. politics scene, generally so important factor for attracting and drawing electorates' interest must be on similar reason, that must be very best timing, it might have been very commonplace interpretation, but it must be the truth.

E.g., if some so ambitious one would run for erection, and the one's political idea would be so sharpened and radicall very much, if the politics' background would be comperatively stable, that idea could never convince so many voters.

Although, the one either has possibility to be elected, but even if the one would be elected, if the one was hastening to achieve the policy, according to the radical degree, the one's politics would be ineffective in persuading general citizens of his or her rein or so.

In conclusion, if the one was starting so smoothly in being anticipated by electorates, but eventually, the popularity to him or her would be descending, gradually, and when the one's advocation degree would be spoiled and additionally so many citizens's dissatisfaction would be full of pomitical world, moreover someone who claims the one's policy and its accomplishment in shortage, the next voicing one's idea or message could be seen and regard as so brave to many electorates and the next appearing one must win the success, that developping would be feasible, that case would be so necessary, of coursr, the next one's fate is at the point being just elected is unknown to anybody, but at least he got good start, that thing could be said by anybody.

But so stark, that timing is consistently so tactflly motivated by the one, is that so necessary? Of course, if the one had so certain self-confidence and conviction, that possibility would be plausible, but its thing would be unseen at the time, probably afterward the one would fulfill the one's ideal and political idea, the one either could remember the time's true mind and the one could confess all.

However, probably we could never formulate any law or so in getting sucssess, coz anybody must be so desperate no mstter what the one addresses with, that thing could be presumed by us, so generally.

Then after all we could never systematize any law around getting win or succsses, or anything of great job, coz all historical examples would be each distinctively particularly unique and each would never have one fixed type or so, probably, I feel I can ever cuess nor surmise. That thing could be caused from what time's proceeding for anyone must never be predicted nor expected by anybody either with the one in question.
(Jun. 1st. 2020)