E. g. in terms of feasibility's degree, we can judge that we have several differentiated type of verbs, at least usage around mindset or mind holding aspect.

One is very honest vi., as what we can have mind so personally, that is e. g. love, like or so, necessarily liking emotion is anytime motinoally subjective and arbitrarily, but that emotion could be abstained at the degree of the one in question to us as personally liking one's own mind which the one accpet that our emotion or not, and almost cases are denial and necessarily our irresistible abandonment.

hence, necessarily that kind of mind is easily to have in mind to anybody, but the levelled minds are just only internally secret mindset or emotional content.
Meanwhile, fulfilling to the emotion and mind is completely different dimensioned thing to us.
Then, eventually, getting true love from the one we presonally have in mind is constantly so uncertain, then liking emotiona expressive intransitive verb is not  on base of responsibility.
Almost case are having stumbling block at fulfilling the emotion, then necessarily "like" means only internally secretly held spontaneous mind, then it ought only to be vi., and usually that verb's usage could be abstained or kind of kept secret.

At this truth, intransitive verb means so modest and just personal, we could say.
Meanwhile, very plainly straght intransitive verb could be present, that is e. g. wanting to climb mountain and wanting to make trip to adjoined region to us, the kind of usage of intransitive verb could be replace to transitive verb as visit or so.
Unless our own schedule could block our wanting emotion, that fesibility level is higher than liking emotional verbs.

Thereby, necessarily, we could define that our subconsiously wanting emotional mind could be replace to be usage of intransitive verb so easily only at mind. E. g. I want to get her as a lover, I want to have her love to me, I want to fulfill my loving emotion to her with her positive reply or so...etc.

Ultimately not so easily gotten thing could never be replaced to be only transitive verb's usage, that could be expressed only by the case not publicly shown to anybody only at perosnal fantasy. Then "hope to have her acceptance to own loving emotion" or so, then, hope and want are intended only at inner potentially stocked emotional expression. Then, very coincidentally these words as verbs with hope and want are usually both used at transitive and intransitive verbs, that phenomenal indication could evidence the verbs as so ambivalent and heterogeneous.

In other words, very easily gotten mind with lking and hoping as these usage of verbs could be ambiguous and not precisely indicated to consequency and reality.

Therefore, in terms of principle, verb's usage at modus ponens must be set with feasilbitly and that thing acompanying responsibity's presence or absence.

All so only arbitrarily held liking and loving emotion could be easily pictured only at mind. Then, necessarily verb "imagine" either belongs to these ambivalent verbs as usage of uncertainty of feasibility.
Toward, these usages, on next Sunday, climbing mountain or making a trip to next region or so are completely different dimensioned usages, because that scheduled and planned things are dependent on very limited condition e.g. with our own switching to set schedule with unexpected incidental reason or so, otherwise, our mind's swtiching, and these things could never be relevant with feasibilty. Then very straight and direct verbs with "go", "visit" are different dimensioned to want, hope, nor like, love.

Hence, necessarily circustamce dependent factors could impact these "go", "visit" or so.
Fundamentally acting by itself is completely feasible, at this fact, these are different from "like(someone)" and "love(someone)".
Then, according to principle of the world, what we need consensus and what we need not to have consensus, these oobviously differentiated modus ponens verbs could exist at daily our usage to words, we must define. Necessarily either going to climbing mountain and visiting sightseing of next region could be accompanied with "want to", "hope to", but these verbs could even if these hoping and wanting condition, basically not dependent on these things' spontaneous consensus, just only dependent on natural condition or rexcheduled circumtance or so with mind changing, then fundamentally these are all never relevant with feasibility ro accomplish, and in that truth, to somebody, "like" and "love" are completely different, we must define the categorizatio there. 

Consequently, we essentially have very direct hope with climbing mountain, makig a trip to next region or so, and very indirect and necessarily needing either consensus from other one, or ones. And at these terms, we can discern "climb", "visit" as both transitive and intransitive, and "like" "love".

In other words, when we deal with verb's grammar and usage mind's structure, directly feasible aspect and not so, needing no consensus and needing it so indispensably as very indirectly feasble as uncertain aspect, these very symmetrical usage could be comfirmed and simultaneously that thing must evidence that our mind could discern at both symmetrical usage at our mind's motion, impulse, and judgement or so, we absolutely obviously distinguish these two typed of usages at acting and realizing or meeting.

And serially thought and debated these all verbs could be addded with "hope", "want", necessarily these verbs' essential functioning signidied identity must have very heterogeneous usage range and each switchable nature, at least our minds could subconcsiously discern and recognize these subtle but so essential gaps with mutually different addtional mind's cognition, even if formally the same wanting or hoping could be pictured at our own mind.

In other words, we have both differentiated mind at wanting(to get), or hoping so, with feasible at making an effort to doing and not reliant with any effort or subjective nor spontaneous mind as so irresistible factor as other one's mind, emotion at each option, and we either are the same to any spontaneous mind to us by the other one, or ones.

Therefore, if we once summarize these all our mind and verbs in relevance, wanting and hoping mind and its accompanying aspect with being direct and indirect have very wide range and very assorted mindsets and aspects. Generally liking and loving emotion to other person is very gapped with just hobby, pastime, favor or so, then not so confessional nor manifestable, then these our discerning usage around “direct” or “indirect” could necessary have mutual difference, and it means and shows that adverb as as-verb’s identity and usage could be deeply interacted with each discerning verbs’ word selection.
Consequently, verb’s analysis necessarily drags us to do either adverb and adjective as the collaborative presence with verb in mutually relevant systematized syntactical structure and necessity at analyzing their relevance and interacted mechanism.
(to be continued)

May. 31st. 2021