In general, consistency thing is interpreted as universally effective as the index signifies the most credible. But is it a little bit unnatural around regarding it as what we intrinsically want it be perfect?

Against it, constancy is including more softened and lazily extended easy attitude as well. 

After all, consistency is probably demanded by mathematically convincing theorem abiding our absolute truth demanding immanence, in other words, some perfection demanding mind of us is displayed at it.

But if consistency is the omnipotent theorem abiding thing, the view at least resists Darwin's Natural Selection. Because nature world means more transcendent to human brain considerable perfection. That must be more naturally approximately realized reality appearance.

Measurable perfection is feasible only at not micro nor not macro at least by our own ability. Because ultimately, our own presicion preciseness has necessary limitation around feasibility. And it could be modified at human body sized extent, as adopted extent limitation to us, you know.

By the way, consistency is term for required by mathematical usage, on the other hand, constancy is more extended demanding by nature. In other words, consistency is needed own numerical correctness and narrowed extent preciseness, on the other hand, constancy is more universally applicable, because applied extent can be easily extended as Darwin's Natural Selection abiding time extent cognition. 

Necessarily it is the remark by Darwinism justice. Though it's more naturally practical index request. Thus, to us, Mathematical preciseness request and Biological naturally extended proper request, both items can be easily deduced at this logical debating.

Logical consistency is based on notionally absolutely credible idea abiding our daily demanding, because we want us evade own easy error or mistake. But that depends on only rationalized Capitalism justice. On the other hand, our own mind even if we are surviving Capitalism society, constantly need another value even in consuming society life spending.
 

By the way, so stark, how Lord or Nature by itself could distribute or arrange both Consistency and Constancy? Is that only whim? Or, kind of some intentional devise He or it could provide us?

By the way, can we regard or define Consistency is made of Constancy provisional own flexible, arbitrary and universally adoptable nature dragging own specific discriminating devise? Or, from the beginning, originally only Consistency consists in own truth precise devise for indicating our now? Notional truth in mutual acceptance or, with it, for the first time, constancy can be made consequently?

But those questioning, in fact, only circular reasoning. After all, probably Natural Selective Statistical Nature's Appearance could have been based with Consistency attending nature necessarily, and Constancy as well by itself could drag Consistency principle originally rooted own reality's blue print or kind of Nature's Gene.

Both things could not be simultaneous nor in turn, merely only both probably mutually easily jointed or kind of originally mutually in fact identical with each other, but at some example, we can deduce it as consistency, and at another time, we can do it as constancy. The interpretable analysis or hypothesis could not be impossible. 

Interimly, why don't we call Class Ambuiguity or Performance Presicion Degree?

Necessarily, this view is one of Pantheism. And Practically Regarded Own Scheduled Harmony. 

(Irregularly continued)

Mar. 29th.   2024