〇Fundamentally, linguistics and language studying are different from literature, I discern them mutually.
Language itself in analysis means mutually sharing somewhat as vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation and diverged elements in relative meaning. Thus, it is almost near to world music’s mode in changing according to spreading tunes and songs, hence its variation in mode usage must provide us the question how these make variants or how each mode is changing in reason analysis.
That must accompany historical analyzing and political motivated somewhat as politics needed music, and music needed motivation in politically meant ideology and patriotism or so.

Music’s switching mode in consciousness includes ethnic identification and question around it and either ethically deliberation by musicians, composers.

〇Meanwhile, literature addresses with human mind’s very darkened part, hence its not always positive part of us in dealing with it.
Although, even both distinct characters have common thing.

It is mutual collision and concession in analysis in terms of our own identity and historical facts’ discovery in excavation to all examples.

Language itself has each one’s no dissatisfaction to other ones, but for each next country’s it, mutually both sides had so many troubles in historically meant bilateral relationship, although e.g. music’s mode variation in so larger space in the earth striding over plural countries and ethnic groups, with diverse mode shifting and mutually impacting echoes together, in variation of them, we can have so many opportunities to each example. All rather provides us interest promoting us only curiosity as long as the one to contact it is interested in music.

In other words, only that parts’ consciousness can solve mutual hostility relevant groups’ resentment.

In conclusion, language’s attractive character in analyzing necessity toward language as viewpoint is necessarily needed to us, even in terms of literature creation.

Rather literature needs never so hostile emotion between and among plural groups in ethnicity than racial and ethnic hating emotion. It rather needs necessary gap between close relation held ones with family or so. For describing anything, anybody with me is addressing with many fictious examples in novel, symbolizing them in poem.
In other words, true parents od children to anyone is the most difficult other one than all strangers or close fellows or private close friends.

〇At the matter of fact, language’s researching is very close to poetry creation, coz poem’s sounding and phrasing is very decreasing the distance between language studying as the object to research or inquire in striding many zones with plural them or just conversation used only for sightseeing travel and either poetry creating.
(to be continued)

(Mar. 3rd. 2020)