〇Being=Existence=Not(Never Changing)

Thus, it shows being is particular uncertain way to be.
In other words, it means either that being could never be told as if any other matters we can easily do so.

If we suppose any other matter except being, we must be able to prescribe only nothing as to never be being, even if we have another existing, we could never be assured of its identity.
Thus, it means the capriciousness by God, I explained beforehand.

Namely, we could never overturn the fact and absolute condition this universe’s the sole birth.
Even if another universe was to be present, we must never encounter it unless we are transendenting God or something, it’s truth.
Otherwise, before this universe’s birth was set, or after the universe’s disappearance in possible situation another universe would be born, in nothing, time itself must never be plausible, thus we could never suppose it.

Thus, if we formulate this universe’s birth in capriciousness by God, it must be equation of miracle or formula of it, or so.

In other words, so called God’s capriciousness as milaculous Big Bang equal to the birth of this universe 18villion years ago, it must be the sole premise to everything. Only it’s non-aggression.
Surely Kobayashi-Masukawa’s theory even had a space to admit the possibility this universe was never be born must be persuasive either, it must be true.

Once David Lewis formulated Modality realism, in it we can assert that it is just the only truth.

Lewis’s idea necessarily one of the anti-Determinism.
And probably it would never be contradictory to Calvin’s predeterminism. Because Calvin obviously claimed that after the birth of the universe created by God, on this sequel, making God father, its Sun Jesus made His advent as original fact was essentially unalterable, in other words, without Big Bang, our universe’s history or the earth history, life creature evolutional history was never be told as its reason all are set as determined wholly, really these occurred as if we are born. Surely the world I was never born must be possible as the past fact to be to its world itself. However, I was born to this world. Thus if the world I as my identity was absent was to be adopted to either the possible world, different job taking myself, or different earth having either this me, as been born there would be one of the possible world, so accidentally in these worlds, this world has me, as David Lewis’s idea was shown in ON THE PLURALITY OF THE WORLD BLACKWELL PUBLISHER、and it is just correct.

Namely, it in conclusion indicates that it is according to only this sentence’s indicating the theory that
Being=Exisitence=Not (Never Changing)

In conclusion, it means that being has no prospect to be developed to the future only in certainty, just coz of it, possible world idea must be set, as just one example of these all possibilities, this world, now myself of this would be possible, he thought.

Thereby, according to this formula, the next one was to be set possibly.

〇As long as Initial setting as the universe’s birth is as if being has no prospect to be developed to the future only in certainty, it must never plausible that all things are previously decided to be.
Thus, upper shown initial setting is never so enough to fulfil our persuasion to anybody, world equal to the creation of this universe, at Big Bang, another condition must be set either additionally, it means,
〇All materials, the ones to be as Dazein consistently according to each now, in other words, just as if now first realized, any matters and things must be symbiotically cooperate with each other, and making co-exitence.

〇Either, human-beings as Dasein, Welt-in-Zein must act according to only self idea or arbitrary decision including the case obeying some other ones.

And if it was never so, at the matter of fact anything must go on only according to decided previously, so absolutely, that case needs no time, it means previously everything must be reasied for, for example completed movie on released. Namely in realtime, even movie masterpiece may have been meeting the blackout of projecting, it’s unknown, at this rate it would be uncertain, at least the real world is never like the movie of sequences in chain.
If it was never the thing like time as passing in no scheduled every occurrence, as time, it must be the printed letters.

In conclusion,

⓪Being=Existence=Not (Never Changing)

①All materials and life ordered ones to be are consistently according to each now, namely at each moment first all things must be set, at some degree, anything must be co-existing and collaborating together.

②Additionally, human-beings as Dasein, Welt-In-Zein must act according to self idea or arbitrary decision including the case obeying some other ones.

These three conditions only were set at the moment of the universe’s birth, so necessarily, by the way ② is the result according to what ① was made so necessarily, if ①was never occring, ② would never have been impossible.
Therefore, universe’s birth=Big Bang, it means so milaculous incident, we could say so.　
Thus, this time’s conclusion as three initial settings must be by themselves would be paraphrased to be milacle formula, either.
But simultaneusly these desicive three conditions are similar to the trinity as Chiristianity so much, its miracle itself at the same time of it, only these were determined completely different from the other all things as never be decided as bein only in uncertainty, even if we suppose so, otherwise, eventually these are so accidental, just coz of it, we could call them so milacluos and it must be the gift or an oracle by God, we could say it so clearly, either it could be so plausible.
In other words, just Evils are according to Jesus Chirist’s sacrifice, redeemed as an absolute dogma has, throughoutly ultimate the theory we are born inherently evil would be turn to the most outrageously tough theory of what we are born inherently so good, namely we all includes all evils could be so reasonable, obliged to be in tough conclusion we could confront, miracle itself is the criteria but whether it is determined wholly or just only so whimusically capricious intriguing in perfect accident, both two things are back to back, it means it either, because if we make our notice concentrated to the universe’s birth in characterized so transcendent to anything, and only with its view, it could be so necessarily as the way to grasp it the fact occurred, but if we do the same to the situation before it absolutely occurred, it could be regaded as so accidentally, we could predicate those two so simultanesuly.

If we exmaplify it, either Shinran’s Jodo-Shinshu is the same, suplendid paradise and being alive itself must be back to back together, meaning so,

1┃0、or 0┃1、otherwise, in supposing that universe of us would be by itself 1, and its way to be and the way to be extinguished or perished so completely would be formulated,

0┃1┃0
We can admit it either.

(to be continued)
(May. 8th. 2019)
Memo; This time exampliefied David Lewis was proposing collaboration together at beginning days of his philosophy work career, it might have been noticed to our mind, either.