Human's history has continued to quest and pursue(at least premise) perfectness as ideal, and basic standard.
Nevertheless, at daily life's consciousness, we could never be engaged in these perfect things' embodiment, never yet we could be defined as the creature never to love only perfection, and rather positively love incomplete things very much usually.
That reason is to some extent caused from our instinctive and basic knowledge that nobody is perfect and ultimately we'd never be so forever.

At the matter of fact, we at daily life positively and spontaneously love daringly not perfect things and matters ought to have another so deepened reason. 
And knowing it so well is probasbly so integral. But for doing it, we have to analyze why our history had notion of perfection e.g. through God as ethical absolute standard.

Probably we must have absolute knowledge that we are never be perfectly goodness acting creature for survival.
Nevertheless, we at a corner of mind, for dealing with anytime conftonted emergent matter for us, unconsciously mobilize our own ill-natured act to any other one, and with that consciousness, we have necessarily either the remorseful mind simultaneously.

Anyway, we usually only love very personally familliar usage at any daily life spot.
And rather we should define us as very enthusiastic fans only needing imperfect things in daily life. But at the same time, we can know that that so expedient favor could never be righteous justice at even and fair ideology, then that favor is prone to be done at very selfish and egoistic mode for another group as mass with company, municipal community, country or so with any unit of grouped order.

Eventually, we know that any unit has very domestic and never so fair prejudiced ideas and unconsciously done lazy usage at socially regarded reality.

In other words, we unconsciously need either not favorite daringly fairness conscious mind for keeping our own just ideology at another dimension of daily acting for survival.
Thus, religious mind and respectful emotion could be one example.
Then at Sunday, we go to church or act at publicly municipal welfare objectied volunteeer or so.

Actually, capitalism economy's reality must force us all to take only surviving strategy and necessarily it pulls either so miserably droping ones out of business or so in competition, then we anytime are surrounded with realistic survival necessary will and consciousness and welfare dutiful emotion and moralistic standard as ideological normativity.

In other words, at the view for us to apply our survival strategy, we could not always be so compatible at both dealings as survival and introspective moralistic act for society by itself.
We know the truth, thus we naturally have both minds with domestic justice and publically righteous idea as ideologically appropriate arbitration at any site we are engaged it.
These conscious matters are caused from our intuitive awareness to us as our mind's disposition to not so even nor fair to anybody at being busy at own survival, but simultaneously we have conscience either, thus with that consciousness, we also need us so to accostommed with justice to any other one in society, and accompanied with introspective mind to very awkward ones for the view to survive.

To very so awkwardly unskilfull ones in society and not getting achievement at adavantageous for evaluated in terms of efficiency rating.

In other words, spiritually our just judgement must depend on both very practically necessary strategic ability to deal with daily businesslike things for survival directly and our necessary spiritual and mindful pitifully affectionate care and contribution to any other one with enemy of our business and own job site.
Paraphrasing it, we need so realistic surviving ability and also humane mind not dependent only on practically abled notion only for directly demanded surviving, through these understandings we can know again so clearly that we are never perfect at being and acting in society.

In fact, we know that we should be noticed that we all are never imperfect at making compatible reality at both surviving and helping other people at any professional job site.
To that view, we are humane presence, but at dealing with own mission, we have irresistibly many enemies for survival, then being successful at getting our own prifit means giving disadvantage to any other enemy sided ones, thus we have two very differentiated recognition in terms of error. One is clearly domestically meant disadvantage, and another is the consciousness at having introspective mind on own doing for having reality for survival with crushing and knocking all business and same job's enemies into piece at winning true advantage. Latter consciousness directly has relevance with religiously regarded humanity or so.

We could never make both things as justice at survival realized at the same time.

One error is set only for our own survival, another it is set only for the view remotely from any professional job duty.
In other words, one succsess means one crushing to any competitor, and one success means to some extent concessively daring sharing to advantage, even at economic freedom society, we have both mutually contradictory minds together and simultaneously.
Then, necessarily error's meaning either, we could know so.

Eventually, we need essentially either generousity not only at personally but also publicly, then domesticity needs it in closed fellow in one unit, and nationality needs it in widened range with either enemies, and capitalism's economics could have difficulty at having generous compatibility with these both meant it as personal justice and public justice.
But entirely totalized reality's each compositively signified factors are reliant on both justices in compatibility and balancing.
Ethical signification and moralistic mind needs inclusion of also enemies' prosperity as live and let live, nevertheless, at daily professinal job at survival it needs only live and let die, thus we anytime are at distress of mind which we should precede just practically and realistically only domesticity and only own surviving advantage otherwise more publicly returnable advantage, of course anybody quests and pursue both things so simultaneously, but we could never anytime make perfect compatibility at these things anytime simultaneously.

There, we can submit a concept as imperfection, in other words, we need not only job, duty and socially public obligation and at the same time, own right at wanting and pursuing personal happiness, simutlaneously.
In other words as the last left thing as our knowledgable notion, we could never realize all perfection, with personally and publicly, then anytime only measuring and relatively balancing could be necessary at judging any occasionally happening thing.

Amongst all these annoyable judging and arbitrating necessity, we anytime as much as possible need only positively suitable and appropriate imperfect at being kept balancing with personally regarded happiness and publicly regarded fairness and mutually concessively wise decision and breakthrough.

In other words, we only need so realistically anyitme suitbly appropriately expedient measure and method to keep both personally and publicly satidfied balanced decision at doing anything with job and personal life.
Eventually, we anytime at the matter of fact, need and quest only so neutrally so versatile imperfection as the best suitable concession and sharing advantage at questing personal advantage.

Necessarily, that our potentially and unconscously questing appropriate imperfection must never belong to God's domain, we with these truth we implicitly are aware of consistently.
In other words, we could never be God, thus we must never survive only absolute justice and fairness, neither enjoy at these tasks. Eventually we need only so relaxed and easy way for making compatibility with our obligatory tasks and personally given right as personal happiness in balancing, and that standard or tacit criterion must be our intuitively aware and noticeable imperfection which could be acknowledged with our just mind and personally given not perfect carnally allowed selfish rejoice.

Doing everything perfectly needs necessarily our own physically and spiritually sacrifice to us so personally and that thing could never last at daily life, at this view, we should inspect our imperfect nature at making mutual cossessively wise solution between obligatory dutiful mission and personally given pleasantly spending time in happiness.

Personal happiness as given right acquirement and publicly regarded justice embodied acuriement are not so easily compatible, nevertheless we simultaneously need them and could never cease the idea and belief to these so easily.
There, we should introduce the very useful and smart conept as "necessary useful imperfection" and to it, we should inspect really realized our all sites in siciety as life's very integral item and analyze that nature's essence.

July. 2nd., 3rd., 5th.    2021

Memorandum; Imperfection as notion or concept for us is seemed so important for regarding our life's aspect, appearance and essence. This essay is only for this time's necessity, but another day, I want to have another so formal questioning essay series about this imperfection's essence questing.