At some very convincing interpretation, even mind state signifiying (in other words, idea verb) could mean and function on the publicly regarded our own consciousness and symmetrical nature to it as secretly holding is secured at a reality in which relatively individually and privately ide is kept never being disturbed. That kind of relative comparaison is applied at these two symmetrical usage at our verbs.

And its signified analysis necessarily calls a very useful reference from the meaningful text as "On Selfhood, the Question of Personal Identity"(1986) as lecture by Paul Ricoer, shown in another text "SOI-MÊME COMME UN AUTRE".（1990)

Though, next words I quoted from the text(as not correctly comlied with original text through my interpreting summary) must show his stance.
And why I insist on his theory is caused from my certain idea that any kind of selfhood and our personal identity issue as mutual so deepened relevance could be seen to manage our idea and having it in mind, and that so close relationship necessarily means us some verb's usage and our understanding to these functional nature.

Ricoer said,

These shown issue as so integral gap or mutually signified blank are relevant with selfhood and action's time systematic dimentional issue.
As my interpretation, we can know selfhood and our personal identified dimentional knowledge and awareness could be totalized with both two mutually different nature given idea's co-existence.
Because, as he emphacizes at the text.

" One has self personality as identiy (mêmetê)(Latin. Idem, Eng. sameness, German. Gleichheit). Another has self personalit as selfhood (ipséité)(Latin. ipse, Eng. selfhood, German, selbstheit) (omitted) This two duel at interpretation aroud self personaity on the background of consistency at time for the first time gets to be genuinely raising question."

" We actually use two consistency's modes I really summarize with two temrs as being desctibed and these are character and promise. I recognize two of them in its consistency which belongs to ourselves. My hypothesis is like next.
Personality's consistency which is holding these two prototypes accompanying mutually contrary polars' natures couldn generate at which character's consistency identified issues' system and  selfhood's issues' system could include to each other, meantime, loyalty to selfhood at the moment promise should be kept can display an extreme gap between self personal's consistency and identity's it, consequently these twp issues could evidence that they do never deduce by themselves. (omitted) Mutually contrary polars' natures I'd like to quest implies story tasty identity could intervene with personal identity, that way to do this is a polar characterized identity and selfhood which try to match with each other, and going through so personally the polar for self-sustainance and it for selfhood could be emancipated from identiy.
(Both parts are from the 5th study, Personal Identity and Story tasty Identity)

These so entangled interpretating analysis must mean that just rarely held our selfhood is anytime surrounded with complete subjectivity and that appearance is completely plain and extremely obvious never to convince us by ourselves, nevertheless, its thing must be applied only to our own mind, in other words, to us, verb's usage knowing each of natures in discernment could drive our daily thinking and acting in balanced consciousness. That obvious gap must tell our mind whether one idea is suitably appropriate for realzing through personal action or not must be set in mind afterward, and in its process, all our mentally and spiritually understandable our ideas' essence could indwells at our mind as which we use analyze, inspect, assume, and presume and scheme in one concrete formed plan or schedule.
In other words, being just plainly conscious about self idea in mind could be only rare, but at repositioning at another level of it, in a view making our own being one other person in social coordinate axis cognition as replacement in configulated point in large extent for our own being.

And in temrs of these serially evidential mind process as gap of each distinctive idea's presence realized at time difference must make us each verb's own character and functioning embodying ability to our own mind.

Through these logically integral schemed our premise at proceeding this themed idea as verb's our mind catching functioning's utility must be replace with next formulated ideas.

　　　

　　　🌟One regarded Mind's our Cognitive process at Usage of each Verb

　　　               E.g.              Like, Dislike, Think, Imagine, Picture
(fore two are so directly emotional and subjective, but next three are indirectly emotional at scheming for reacting, embodying hopeful act or speech.)

                                                                       ⇩

Afterward having upper prelude of thinking process, we usually keep another phased mind's idea as lasting, continuing belief, and idea around reality. That means almost decisively set the idea as seemed so correct as comparison between just wishing, hoping and wanting and realizably conviction's assessing and rating in mind with presumption around feasibity.

                                                                      ⇩

      Replacement to act in judging which it could be eligible or inerigible in mind.
                           Socially Belonging Consciousness accompanying in mind.
                           E.g.            Decide to do, not to do, 
                                              Have, Keep, Hold in mind, or Make up mind to do, 

Consequently,
                                                                     ⇩

Keeping only liking emotion in mind, through Decide, Love, Watch, but not contacting, or very rarely, in feasibility's conviction, Approach, Contact, Speak, Talk or so.
                                            
                          E.g.              Act, Stop, Think, End, Finish, and Conclude.

These serially ordered mind idea and publicly engaged scheming process could be seen so adaptable at these relevant debating subject at this series.

(to be continued)

Jun. 19th. July. 12., 13th.     2021