Even if our own body at physical dimensional things could be extinct at any meaning, our soulful ideas as what we could regard so precious, and ideally regarded value must be immortal, we can think so and can have that conviction.

Otherwise, these our belief must be kind of commonly shared our parmanent entity.
That our socially realizable immortality must make us easy and healed at watching so morally fragile and just very ephemeral things in daily life with someone's death or so.

Our very natural belief that the most precious our own value must never be ruined nor invalidated at least at our mind and its idea.

These assumptions could be done to us as somewhat so credibly to our own mind.

In other words, we all are carriers to send them all to next generation ones for us, then all things we'd done in society before must be carried to any future appearable ones advent, rather only for that contribution's necessity, we could say that we all are identified as human being. Either we wish so to us as human.

At least what we think the thing so necessarily must sustain our social activity in which anybody could never perticipate in without words usage.

Material must follow physical law, and not break it. Though physical law is just finite.
That must follow own law as not resisting any entropy's exetention or so.
Though we feel that usually being free could be embodied at free transition in so wide range and movable arbitrary realized state could be seen or felt so free, though on the contrary kind of not moving, not making locomotion nor no changing could not be felt so freely, never yet ordinarily that condition could be seen so bored or so unattractive, though necessarily oridinarily so that state could be at true estimation so free as an absolute free in terms of philosophy specifically in some context like Emmanuel Kant's ethical freedom, not taking entropy's exetention, rather suppressing it, that freedom could be possible in terms of absolute meaning or a term of philosophy.

Hence, though physical law is finitely regulated not so free at any arbitrarily freedom, in other words, any physically necesssary change and that direction must have regulation in never changed aspect, though to us, our mind, absolute freedom could be assumed.

In other words, nature world must have limited various condition, as physic's terms.
And what regards it must consist in our mind's comprehension and its inifite range at imagining everything.

Though our mind makes us the reality in which we can think any substantial law abiding o
physical phenomena is regarded as being positioned in our mind capably picturing extent.

Mind makes us matrial awareness in discriminated toward not material thing, its physical law either, grasping these things makes us acting according to it.

Ordinarily, in real world for us, freedom for us is bound to irreplaceable law. Though we all are chasing each freedom in own limitation, freedom must never be serured infinitely, and ordinarily in society, the matter must be agreed so implicitly to anybody, though the way be free is so stereotyped and regarded at normalized sensed estimation, though, e.g. time machine could have been thought by many old science fiction novelists.

Our mind must follow that rule naturally in no notice, thereby, necessarily tthinking analysis circuit or aspect could have own ordinary pattern, and necessarily mind works consist of brain working contents. And its own objectively remoted view consists in kind of our mind attending very persistent idea that we could never abandon any advancing to next phase.

In wlking at whirlpool of any coritical survival crisis for us, we could never have proceeding without knowing that domain, we could never do so at unknown it.

These factual our mind's essence means that we could do us some passionate incentive to drive our mind at engeging our soul with aimed target in doing anything.

And that thing could be interpreted our own resistance to our mortality and physical law abiding realiy's shackle. Necessarily we could never invalidate our mortal life with that truth.
Nevertheless, at least at reviewing any reality with physical law and in relatively contrust view, we could introspect our own mental and spiritual nature on running all life reality's span.

That phyisical law abiding truth's possible freedom and impossible freedom in relevance either means kind of extentional cognition around intension of possible thing to us.

Necessarily, that our realizable exetent dragging truth in understanding makes us know birth to death and its mortal life span and their never switchable physically destined necessity.
Those all understandings must be easily replaced with conceptual grasp for us in daily life.

However, at the same time, even in so limited extent of life span, as much as possible we can make the best effort around trying to enhance what life means to us.

Anyway, physically we'd never be sensible at entropy's reduction in only very free or kind of so diffusaly enjoyable to us, ordinarily.
Nevertheless, even if it'd be kind of superficial mindset, but eventually only at minimized extent precise measurable inspection, we can have no reasonable gambling mind so enjoyably, at taking that micro dimensional applicable possibility as the best inquring object.

That must be the fight to time, nevertheless, we have the strongest ally, that is space.
Only space could not escape from us, in other words, being of us as the absolute fact must rely on spatially present situation, though space and us are conspiratorial relevance, in other words, nevertheless space must be present in which any being must never be present must be so contradictory absolute contradiction to us, at least for our known universe or so as the being.

Never yet, space by itself must need being with us.
By the way, that could never be present at any philosopher's mind, that idea could never had done in their mind, ordinarily. 

Exceptionally, mathematician's role recognizable philosopher like Des Cartes, Russell or so could have that idea.

Des Cartes's cogito, cogitatio, cogitatum or so must have been his cognition around arbitrarily free extending the extent for our cognitive distinction between physically possible and impossible discriminated discernement. If that consciousness could have not been attended to his mind, he must have never outputted these ideas in philosophy history.

That must be already extention as what could be over possibility and intention as what could be done sustantially and phyically in given condition.
Though his idea is never that the sole proposition is mind as never spiritualism, that must be applied to Bergson either.

To us, regression must be embodied at our thinking experiment using transition from extentional grasp to intentional really embodied aspect in relative cogntion. 
That once had departure to extention and having regression again for really embodied domain we can practically observe.

That come and go means so much to our daily realizable routine.

In this process or kind of thinking procedure otherwise, kind of thinking circuit, or cycle, next supposition could be done for the present.

〇MATHEMATICAL MEASURABLE APPROACH

〇BIOLOGICAL MEASURABLE APPROACH

〇PHYSICAL MEASURABLE APPROACH

At next chance to debate the proposition, I'db address to these three recognizable approaches synthesis and each role's mutual relevant reciprocity at taking own meaning.

(to be continued)

Jan. 30th.  31st.     2022