A＝B ⋀ A ≠ B　

could be possible only at AMBIVALENCE.

Except its case, any other normal case must be

￢（A＝B ⋀ A ≠ B）

Nevertheless, we usually take an idea that if we are questioned which we are intereted in something or not, either the moment we don't want to answer yes nor no.

In other words, not affirmation nor negation in answering properness must be made at occasion that one indicated item's mentioning by requested is unwillingly responding could be done but this situation is not so pleasantly felt in mind.
That could be denial demanding mind around given questioning and answer in conversation.

That structure means propositioning's skepticism or unacceptable mind around demanded situation at being requested to answer.

Upper truth interpretation must drag us into some our mind's appearance around that one indicated supposition is tested at assessing appropriate or not.
That proposition must mean that originally proposing act must be made at some decisive shortage of sufficiently prepared nor set order.

Because, originally, questioning must be made at some certain consciousness around given situatiton's incompleteness.
Though, something's set, e.g. life value could include happiness, effort, accomplishment, resuming, resting, aiming, targetting..etc.

Proposition is made by our mind attending anxiety, and worry at only seing through our own reality, otherwise, satisfying our mind with already acquired conviction.

E.g. in our privately given so difficult situation, we could have an idea around categorizing the good persons for us personally, then this questioning must output the set of good persons for us, and that proposition must make us another set as not good persons for us, or to say, bad persons for us.

Nevertheless, in gradually diffused frustration in mind for us, the swtiched mind occasion, we can judge that that assessing mind or procrastination by itself must have caused us have proposition around set theory reliant comprehension toward reality.

It make sure is that mind convincing process could be seen so unnecessary roundabout, but rather we once had that seen so unnecessary mind question, we'd afterward in solusive mind have a mind for aiming another thing in discriminating ever what we did before that question was held in mind.

At this interpreted mind process, Russell's paradox could tell us that "ONE PROPOSITIONAL ASSESSMENT or kind of INTROSPECTIVE MIND PROCESS INSPECTION means SET THEORY USAGE and its MECHANICAL SIGNIFICANCE in RE-DEFINITION".

In other words, "～” was actually taken by Russell's mind, probably definitely.

There, if upper truth could be so trustworthy propositional definition, next formulation could be given to us, necessarily.

If chaos could be supposed being kind of our anxiety tempting own anxiety, that could be like be like next.

￢（A＝B ⋀ A ≠ B）
as meant that one indicative definition as A＝B is not so suitable for our given situation, though necessarily that first given proposition makes us the idea that 

Given (A＝B) means nothing. Thereby, necessarily it deduces that either (A ≠ B).

And generally, upper (A＝B) and (A ≠ B) must become contradictionary, mutually.
Nevertheless, in anxiety or worry, we are prone to take these in 

（A＝B ⋀ A ≠ B）

However, necessarily, that could be generally contradictory, though we'd re-deduce that upper formulation must be one of our mind's uncertainty dragging anxiety, then, in our reset celarized conscoiousness, we'd be obliged to define like next,

￢（A＝B ⋀ A ≠ B）
Though, upper re-definitive equation means that we once have anxious and worrisome
 mind around our own expectation, inductively could be guided to output.

If these process could be converted summarized equation, there must be like next.

￢(A＝B)＝( A ≠ B)

and upper formulated reality must be converted into either like next.

￢(A＝B)＝( A ≠ B) could be replaced with

￢｛(A＝B)＝( A ≠ B)｝, though, necessarily, 

｛(A＝B)＝( A ≠ B)｝means nothing, at least at the dimension of truth significant equation.
If upper ｛(A＝B)＝( A ≠ B)｝could be replaced with C(chaos), 

C ⊃ ｛(A＝B)＝( A ≠ B)｝

Necessarilly, there A means something's set's each element by itself, and B means those elements deducing "set" by itself.

E.g. in my house there could be staying white cat, black cat and brown cat.
These cats' each indication means cat's element, and totalized indication means cat's set.
And(former ＝ latter) is (A＝B) and toward it, claiming that it's contradictory is ( A ≠ B).

Nevertheless, if we could equate that either ｛(A＝B)＝( A ≠ B)｝, that must not be rationally deductive equation, though that must be chaos.

Nevertheless, if we interpret our mind conceiving idea process, necessarily, next three equations must be necessarily outputted.

A＝A, B＝B, and  A ≠ B

That the simplest combination around element A and B in interepretation of set around A and B.

And, necessarily, this procedural interpretation means that ￢(A＝B), in other words, (A＝B) is contradictory.

Though, discovery of contradiction makes us "dualism's leap", means TRIPLISM.
And in mind idea's processing procedure, constantly, we can have an idea these three dimensional indication around substantial noticed object with A and B as our mind's interpreting comprehension.

In conclusion, we can regard Russell's Paradox as presence of our mind's interest, notice and conceivable attention.
And the considerable mind process must pull through chaos presence in proposition, or proposing.

Though, DUALISM means ORDINATE MIND and, TRIPLISM means INORDINATE MIND, though if we interpret our daily mind, more closer to rather TRIPLISM as  INORDINATE MIND.

And, DUALISM must have a structure like next.

To given one definition A, 

S=A and, S≠A, 

Toward, or against it, TRIPLISM must have a structure like next.

S=A⋀S≠A, S=A∨S≠A, ￢(S=A⋀S≠A),

Though, necessarily TRIPLISM must be deduced as DUALISM's one DEVELOPED Form or Order.
And, deductively at conceptually analyzable necessity, DUALISM is based on 2 dimensional procedural equation's conversion.
Against it, TRIPLISM is done on 3 dimensional OVERLOOKING VIEW as if realized BIRD'S EYE VIEW, though necessarily TRIPLISM means once simply done procedure, and TRIPLISM means introspetive looking back procedure, though more procedural iteration is added to former.

(Irregularly to be continued)

Apr. 29th.    2022