Happiness, as a notion which pretends to be the most integral indication could drag our own life stiffly persistent to only limited factors.

Though, essentially we should overcome that used and things not worth bothering about could expand in human personal life.
Though, we plainly abandon all these old style conventional notion once so decisively, and if that doing could have been done so smartly, we'd have very refreshed mind and resume what we should do must run so well.

HAPPINESS is what we should FIRST GIVE UP so personally.

And with its prepared mindset, we FIRST STEP INTO TRUE SIGNIFICANT LIFE so personally and publicly we'd be recognized and approved our own stance and what we usually do.

Probably, to us, ethical issue is the most daily useful mindset.

First, happiness as one of typically fixed notion is not accompanying specific explainable substance. Though, that would be kind of very streotyped socially recomendable one formal instruction whihc could already be so anachrornic.

Though, we dare to throw that value away and should grapple with everything in perfectly reset mindset.
Paradoxically, in focusing on only conventionally socially seen valuable, we rather should neglect all things and just keep going my way with own common sense and own method, not depending on only socially harmfully dangerous act, just normally admittable action and useful method should be fermented by our some term considerably thought ideas.

And that should be just for ourselves so personally, not dependent on any other one.
Necessarily, no matter what we'd try, any error or not well done case must generate in our own life, but to only that thing, we should not be gloomy around what we do at each moment, we should be positively arrogant at trying anything.

Japanese very famous novelis Yukio Mishima was seen the person whose mottoe was not permitting his older days' senior life so generaously, that impressive interpretation was confessed by his literature and way of life reseacher one critic.

Mishima was really the geniusly great author and novelist, but his consciousness was besieged by very strong aethetics only useful by himself. Though also around his life, aethetics must be one of so strongly consciousness around way of life as the best ideally regarded, in other words, very reliant on vanity, you know.

E.g. gradually aging and having some useful detachment is not that bad mind nor emotion to our own life.
However, this time claim must mean that feeling aspect around Happiness's definition is arbitrarily personally specific, and only permiting so must be the sole definition around what we should regard happiness.

Today is soon ending, but at next time, how we can think of contribution to our society and community, only that thing could be addressed there, I'd like make every proposition as much as possible figured out so smartly and easily.

(Irregularly to be continued)

Apr. 30th.  2022