One person's arbitrary jtdgement and own decision has some personally specific reason to drive the one to do so.

Fundamentally, unless extreme dictatorship country forces any citizen to obey all what to do at any site in society, we fundamentally can have arbitrary judging way for dealing with any necessary case for solution.

And that appearance must have some gap from usually the one's applying attitude and idea. And that real is not so unnatural, far from it, rather that taken stance is very natural.

Because we all are surviving perfectly very ambitious and very complicated society in which very twisted and mutually contradictory ideas are adjacent to each other in one person's mind and publicly shown stance.

Because perfect constanc is rather so unnatural factor for sustaining any life survival necessity.

Though, we all are anytime vigilant at taking social stance for occasionally compromising any kind of necessary condition among which we stand at socially interacting.

In other words, our society implicitly suggests us some very arbitrarily necessary social wisdom for surviving ourselves.

Though, necessarily we need to discriminate any remark display to anyone according to each occasionally necessary site, circumstance and any sort of really facing scene's background.

We need to protect our own survival safety from own unnecessary risky factors and unnecessary conditions for survival for us personally seen so dangerous.

In other words, society thing is specifically identified presence or substance in which anybody should try to be only at officially and formally so neutral at any facing and confronting situation at some never rare but so frequently contactable irresistible situation in which so many hostile idea accompanying or immanently holding ones.

Though, society is actually the specifically identified substance in whicht, by which we are irresistibly concede or compromise any mutually gapped idea, course, ideology and life view anyone must have in mind.

If we try to break through any site in having only not compromising attitude and own stance, we are obliged to crash any other one at some unnecessary objectionable hostility.

That unsolvable sustenance is emptily futile.

Though, basically we should keep two mutually differentiated stance at displaying publicly as one is what we can confess only to familiar or mutually sympathizing pal or fellow, friend and another is only stranger, or our own residential area's acquaintance or familiarly contactable one.

We are surrounded by so integral necessity to discern each case in any social site.

If to that stance, somebody could claim that the attitude is not so honest, the one could never survive any society. Because any society must have own complicated mosaic composition in which any mutually different race, ethics or national identity or so. Political ideology and income divisional classified and each categorized unit are at complicated interactions and mutually very twisted relevance attending reality is so normally embodied.

(Irregularly continued)

Sep.  25th.   2022