One thing we can define and confirm is what we can have consciousness derives time's "now"'s cognition as our probably the absolute truth is never the same with contrary to it as "now"'s cognition derives consciousness.

Certainly, before we'd learnt words, we can have some realtime cognition, but intrinsically its cognition is never words notion's suggestion, though essentially, that vague time's cognition is not defined as "now".

Probably it could be very ambiguous complex cognition which is not that clear discrimination.

Though, now's consciousness must be derived from certain words and our lifetime abiding own socially and anthropological view attending own clarified consciousness. "Now" must signifies so.

Then, first what should be define "consciousness" could be our one of so vital proposition.

Consciousness must have words communication deriving own systematized cognitive mind's nature.

Nevertheless, we can have another very simple suggestion. That is what our cognitive mind is not always o notional it, but also physiological it.

Though, essentially, "now"'s consciousness means so complicated and very ambiguous, and totalled as a posterior view. And rather a priori view is gotten rather a posterior.

In other words, our already acquired cognitive mind must have own abbreviation. If that omission could not attend to our mind, we'd never have ordinary and normal cognition.

Otherwise, to our daily normal life, that abbreviating mind's deal must mean so much.

Why I claim so consists in that our anthropological identified human presence view abiding and our sociological that thing must make our daily action and idea outputting reality.

Necessarily, upper all those ideas are never so newly discoverable views. Rather these are very normal.

Just one thing we should keep in mind is probably omission concretely provable cause might have been what we can survive means our own communication must be caused from that we all use some restricted own formally and officially regarded correct and appropriate view around composing our basic daily communication.

And necessarily, that very daily our cognition is probably our tacitly admittable and recognizable view around our totally socially interacting own our mind's devise. And it means some very indispensable mutually kind of autonomously harmonizing interlocking subconsciously taken and occasionally very obviously conscious cognition.

Interlocked our society's intrinsic nature also originates in physiologically ethological mechanically reasonable meaning.

We can easily assume so.

What should we regard that seen so integral "interlocking" or "interlocked" our consciousness and reality?

That could be to some extent, kind of anthropological view applicable it, and additionally, that depends on also ethologically as its view applicable. 

Next occasion, I'd address to these debtable and analyzable approaches.

(Irregularly continued)

Oct. 20th.  2022