○God's affection is what our love to I t and its undoubtful belief we could necessarily produce in our own mind. (It's ordinarily anybody's attending idea. Wicked rogues moreover. In other words, the ones whose thing is known to them than anybody who must have that consciousness than any other one.)

○In other words, mind's satisfaction, concrete affection's fulfillment in mind to nature (Kant's Criticism to Judgement), otherwise, our own experience around knowing beauty, acceptance of beauty and asking to God after all are all never irrelevant with each other.

○By the way, originally do we know God so concretely in mind behind the background of completion in beauty, don't we?

That mind could be caused from what we have expiation to our history, and its attending various absurd actions, and our own hope to have consensus to acknowledge the justice. We'd never exclude in tacit condition, and its mind could drag the truth God = Perfection, infallibility, no defection, all could be obliged to set all ideas.

 

In a premise, we'd set infallibility, anybody could have greediness, emotion to remonstrate our own "individual" and belonging to the unit of us.

Then, it is reasoned in terms of religious notional point of view, spontaneous religious precepts either, ethical justice owning inspontainity, in other words, our own awful mind to retaliation.

(To be Continued)

July. 11, 12th. 2020, first written in Japanese, translated into English at Nov. 11th., 12th.  2022.