Spatially empty field claims by itself so confident extent and comprehensively stable something.

Blank includes everything. And no claiming so much in specifically unique nature, that so plain and flat mere character enchants us.(that signifies our own cold-blooded nature)

That merely simple straightness tells us so utterly frank nature.

Blank's stroke is so stronger than anything.

Because only blank provides any containable room to anybody.

We should review very monotonous nature again.

Blank's nature otherwise could be formulated like next.

If nothing in space could be defined as S(0), S(0) must tempt us into next mind to us.

S(0) ⇔ ￢S(1)

In there, S(1) could be supposed at being filled with something, it'd be like next, but "No space could be

 ￢(S),

S(1)  ⇔  ￢(0) ∧ ￢(S)

Upper equation means that,  "being filled with" is defined both "space's filling in giving no more chance to put something and originally given nothing for putting anything.

Fundamentally, one space already used for filing completely and even confirming the space to fill is not given are, in terms of spatially acquisitive occasion, no difference to each other.

Those formulated signication is equivalent with socially given chance and no chance, in terms of sociological extent.

If "socially given" could be defined as S⭕S, no space given means like next. 

If human right can be put on H⭕H,

￢S(1) ⊂ ￢ H⭕H,

Though, necessarily, 

￢ H⭕H outputs,

                        ￢ (S⭕S) ∧ ￢S(1)  .

(Irregularly continued)

Nov.  20th. 2022

Appendix; This essay Intends to describe "true blank" in definition.