Both in each one is mutually too close and too indifferent, as long as unit's being is sustained, any hostility must never disappear.

On the other hand, even if any unit could be arbitrarily invalidated, that each perfectly no order state must be demanded to be revised, though consequently necessity of unit must come up to disorderly state abiding people, after all any case must make the same realities.

In other words, at one unit, both mutually familiarly contacting and mutually rationally perfectly independently surviving, the unit's own developing appearance must have own nationally specific nature.

Because to us, mutually familiarly and rationally independently are also arbitrarily made consciousness, though for any outsider, any unit must be seen so own nationally solidarity abiding unit.

In other words, we potentially need intrinsically only very obvious belonging consciousness around our own social survival. 

And that our mind's realizable consciousness makes us own national settling country, using language abiding own consciousness. And necessarily those all are unit abiding responsible mind. 

Our social conscious mind and that mind dragging own domesticity and familiarity or so, and we usually have own consciousness around doing anything and any trial for us personally and necessarily publicly.

And at least at ordinarily reasonable mind, between and among two or several units, mutual communication must have own belonging unit's advantageous strategy at any unit's one.

In other words, as the necessity around negotiation and consensus, we have own unit abiding belonging consciousness.

The our own daily realiy dependent mind makes us some personal conviction. That is belonging unit's responsible mind as membership.

Necessarily, at mutual units' own hostile crisis, we want mobilize our mind into another unit's one and ones at hegemonic reciprocal approach and expedient negotiable communication.

(Irregularly continued)

Apr. 29th.  2023