Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Any Person could never Survive only with Rational idea 1.

We all have time to drink. Certainly, too much drinking is not good for health, we know so well, but that time must be needed to us.


We all are very contradictory living thing. Creature, but very mentally cotradicorily injure our own mind and heart acing time is attending, but simultaneously so irritating own that state, anytime only undigested mind is felt remained in own idea.


Though, basically, human is a thing which could never survive only according to rational idea, e.g., to realize or accomplish an object for our expedient or interim lay set index, in sometimes satisfied consequences, but another time, not that emotion leaves.


Of course, we could never be present only for having good feelings, rather not that feeling time is so continuous, and anytime, we wish coming time for good result in good feeling, but necessarily hardly be coming in spite of our daily effort, though wishing own good time spending is so naturally indispensable mind and time.


Probably, any estimation toward outputted data must follow rstimating one's own whole balanced inference, of course, even its balancing conjecture must be so subjective. Just anybody tries to eating some probable ratio at any inferred case.


Around any responsible matter we could be responsible, we actually as much as possible try to be normally probable case only careful that own subdued attitude, we are apt to opt, but simultaneously, rather imagining of picturing the warts case as probably outputted whole images so daringly, and in outputted appearance, we must find some appropriate future prospect figure so smartly.


Though, any scheduling must go on according to our own regarded so normal case taken account attitude.
Nevertheless, even when we try to output our own schemed schedule draggable outcome esteemed data, even if we must not consciously make some very subjective esteemed method, we could never be perfectly rationally conjecture, because we all are only personally surviving own individual, and own subjectively analyzing that very ambiguous, very uncertain ained thing dealer.


At the matter of fact, from the beginning, what we try to be fair around as much as we should not be only subjectively do everything, that idea by itself already is evidencing our not rationally thinkable presence. In other words, we are never cool estimating nor only systematically efficiency establishing abiding computer nor highly evaluating objective machine.


When we face unexpected proceeding and outputted numerical value, we must have strong unease or anxiety and, necessarily at knowing not that good result, very dissatisfied with totaled ongoing and own performance. And around throat proceeding and process, we can easily very irritated at watching whole appearance.
Though we won't be everlastingly rationally facing nor addressing presence, far from it, that perfection approachable own desirable existence and the disposition could never be overcome, that previously prepared own detach,ent should be known to our mind, so consciously.


Because even if we'd have some all probably esteemed result consequently after accomplishing all what we'd schemed at dealing with, we must have, to some undeniable extent, attend own dissatisfaction and disillusioned impression around what we'd established though any data or any criticism by any other one.


Additionally, around the same result watching again, any concerned member must have each gapped impression and estimation around established performance's evaluation. 


In the end, no matter how we previously planned fairly schemed running and proceeding, around them in general already anybody must have each distinct idea, impression and estimation, that never mutually absolutely accord acquisitive state is just our true appearance, and only mutually gapped result only constantly outputted appearance is true our appearance. Thereby, we try to have rationally idea, at least we as much as possible try to do so, but already in doing so at being obliged to do so, that appearing nature must prove that we are never universally and constantly rational.


Certainly, we anybody can have each unique idea and ideally regarded thought and mind, but that mutually never perfectly accord acquisitive appearance shows us so irrationally gathered mass, or merely arbitrary organized unit. We can judge us so incomplete.
 In fact, no matter what we grapple with, we each personally very gapped tough reality mutually, though at this premise, we all are never rationally perfect accord shared presence.


Though from the beginning, we should comprehend that we are merely imbalanced only imperfection persecuted own stange unit, as the absolutely premised condition, at should have and share that detached consensus to each other.
Originally, we should neve be nor aim any ideally perfect group nor gathering mom rather anytime we should make up our mind to be only incomplete unit or very twisted contradictory mass or so. 


In this globe, on the earth, there is no perfect unit nor gathering, group so definitely. Only the  interpretation or definition is to some appropriately regarded extent, absolutely correct, though these days'  any global situation is as it appears.


In other words, we anytime spending only collusion, disharmonized conference or meeting to each other, and that's the end, and it's fact is not that negative nor positive, only the detached view is to some credible extent so correct, if not tha so at least it'd never be false nor lie. 
Only in those so ridiculously given reality, very out of the blue some not that bad so impressively evaluated result, we can witness, and rather only to it, we should be satisfied with. And we should never need more ideally regarded any performance so constantly and only that detached own determined mind is to some valid extent so appropriately evaluated positively. 


(Irregularly continued)





June. 16th.    2023,  
caused from note at March 10th. 2020