To some extent around our socially on responsible term, how we privately prosecute any evil doing for protecting our own safety and strictly necessary security.

That must have been claimed by Nitzsche at Zarathustra.

And, Hitoshi Nagai had known that truth from his younger generation academician ages.
In other words, at his paper text as dialogue form applicable problematic text "倫理とは何か"( "What is Ethics?"), he submit questionable proposition so earnestly.
That is like next.

If we have own mind around at very critically survival threatened situation to us, if somebody who is definitely innocent, but if the one could be liquidated as his life losing, any other one must be helped at guaranteed safety, what we should take our own stance? 

Upper his claim must be applied for any really actively servicing politician.

However, if we regard his supposed own proposition must be definitely negated nor refused through Kantian dogmatization. ( as Emmanuel Kant )

In other words, substantially, there must have been Avery wicked ones even if truly immanently so not good, but really pretending to be so good is more harshly wicked, but rather actually, pretending to be bad, or worse that truly the one is, that attitude is more not that worse, but very simply not knowledgeable.

Those mentioned own paradoxically embodies human appearance is not that abnormal, far from it, very ordinarily observably seen in any site for our life daily days.

Of course, necessarily the top governed should not take Nagai's own proposed subjective doing origupinakly, ethically. Nevertheless, actually, in any society or circle for human being surviving necessity, very many only cunning acts and behavior must be easily recognized at anybody's interopspective view, in other words, we are not Angels, far from it, we all are to some life security necessity extent, so actually satanic or very tactfully vigilant at neglecting very weakened ones or not smartly surviving ones in keeping securing our own socially guaranteed safety life running, so personally.

In fact, we have own consientious regard around social survival, nevertheless, for encountering any externally meeting wicked other one's own conspiracy at so obliged reality's own severe reality, some remorseful own cold hearted treatment, anybody must have done more oreless, we certainly could say so.

And, actually, we are never well surviving only attending pure hearted own social justice, of course, we can never be generous around any cunningly vigilant satanic action nor violently behavioral act so easily. Nevertheless, more or less, we are never perfection nor completely only goodness prosecuting presence.

Rather, if we regard it as so natural, that attitude must be negatively naive.

Though, at least at those interpretable contexts, Nagai's submitting proposition is even if so defiantly human's necessity evil abiding own skeptically satanic allegory, rather very honestly regarded just Nitszche a binding Zarathustra idea, as honesty as Kant originally submitted at his philosophy.

However, all those propositional examples are all our truly given cause to demand God, we surely define in orthodox theory and logical circuit.

This time, so far, we should deter more progressive advancing so smartly, and at next chance to debate those ideas, we should make us more advanced.

(Irregularly continued)

July. 7th.   2023