After all, in fact, only to us, not that any other thing must be so certain but only not obviously grasped nor not that definitely identified, those impressive minds are probably not that big error, we could say. 

Though, necessarily, only empty felt own mind must be the most trsutworthy to us at least at very minimally necessary occasion to us at any rate. Because ordinarily we can start anything around having only ambiguously grasping to anything. 
In other words, beforehand we can launch something, around it, everything could be understood or grasped so perfectly, we need never to do it daringly.

Though, not knowing to everything so certainly as generally mentioning thing is very convincing truth, and it probably identifies with Des Cartes owning idea that only being "myself" is merely the most certain thing. Because without it, we can do any mentioning thing in daily life, ordinarily. 

Though, if our own brain could have whitened state, that can never be so dangerous, far from it, unexpectedly, very healthily welcoming state for us. Because to us, what we can fell or think that everything is obviously grasped, that idea is nothing but some dangerous delusion. 

As the basic ground, never everything must be grasped, only the conviction must guide us into next step or phase confrontation to our reality. Though everything seems to be ambiguous and mystified, that attached idea is not that dangerous than feeling everything is seen obvious with only our own intuition. Necessarily at the very risky desperately last ditch situation, that so delusive idea even is very effective, the case could not be that so embodied. But ordinarily, we are having only not that obviously seen in any matter or any event.

Though, we can have for the first time whole setting basic ground only with abandonment around grasping everything so perfectly. Though, knowing no sense around universally grasping nor catching any intrinsic nature so at a stretch. 

That definite launching mindset is probably not that obviously knowing anything at a stretch and Des Cartes owning subjective idea that "I am because I think." are mutually never so remotely distributed idea. In other words, only so simply abandoning anything at a stretch known so clearly to us, the idea unexpectedly very similar with Des Carter's " I am because I think."

Because the identity which seems or thinks that I am not well known to everything but "being myself now." is almost identical with "Knowing Everything st a stretch is Impossible." So structurally identical to each other. Though West and East are never so mutually remotely. At least spiritually intended mind dimensionally so. 

Otherwise, very obviously seen empty must be some the most satisfied healthy condition given to us, at least for knowing some subjective proposition so well, personally, absolutely personally, only the mind is correctly appropriate universally. 

(Irregularly continued)

Nov. 27th.   2023