Human thing must have the stance that true appearance by the one could not want to disclose or expose to the ones whom are regarded not that favorably contactable, the fact is very universally recognized and at least to me, the matter is very applicable case. 

Because in general, to human individual, hateful ones are not the ones to whom true mind and true idea is never told nor never confess honestly. 
After all, any human relationship must have own truth that only to believable ones from bottom of heart and mind, anyone can confess all or disclose all intelligence around "myself", but necessarily its extent is constantly finite raged one, that could be said in general. 

Anyway, being known to our own individual circumstance and own idea is not that safer matter to any individual, though we can react so carefully to not well known ones in general, at any daily reality.

Human thing is except being own "myself", almost all are just only inference or conjecture, we could regard so, in other words, except "myself" no matter is definitely credibly trustworthy, we could say so definitely. And unexpectedly, only the truth relatively trustworthy idea, we could say in general. Though, necessarily, except it, any idea is not that certain, we could say so as well. 

Unidentified impression to each one's own "myself" is certainly what we can regard, but that is probably the allegorical expression form, but truly after all, we can be only known to own "myself", that is the sole credible fact to us. And if that could be falsehood, we must never believe anything around any matter in terms of any item.

Though, ultimately Des Cartes discourse "I am because I think" is the sole decisively credible idea around what we should believe in. 
And, probably, in any human individual presence, not hesitantly streamed and emitting ideas as well as jet sprinkling emission is the definitely own credibly seen ideas. If we doubt it, rather the one must be multiple personality syndrome, we can say definitely so.

With those credibly regarded remarks, we could say that unexpectedly Burtland Russel and Des Carters both ideas are never so remotely positioned ones, we could say so, relatively as not that false seen it. Because Russel's Paradox signified structure is unexpectedly similar with Des Cartes owning "I am because I think" means merely I as he indicates is set by itself as Russell's Paradox in general claims. Because Russel's claiming own "Set by itself" almost is identical with Des Cartes's "I". Because Des Cartes mentioning "I" and Russel's Paradox's Set by itself both are completely "Absolute Propositions". As without it, any logical inference must be impossible. 

And, very by and large, any self confidence must have own leaping nature, you know, and without it, anybody must have no self confidentially trustworthy idea everlastingly. 

By the way, "Absolute Propositions" must be the matter, without it, any other propositions are never realized nor composed, that thing only can be called so. Though "Absolue Propositions" are ultimately equivalent with "the Sole Credible Subject". 

(Irregularly continued)

Nov. 27th.    2023