Until Part17, we exclusively have debated around our working time mainly as the object to be told in analysis of previously acquired data refference and future prospect driving our essentially pratical working efficency and its productive completion in introspection. That must be so correct running course, but it must be too practival to interpret all our life aspect so tollay, then this time, switching a little bit tendency in subjective topic, more metaphysical nature dispositional item or matter could be addressed with this debate's subsequent sequence.

First, for debating this series' main bone as time's cognition for us, Heidegger's idea as mainly quoted from "Sein und Zeit"(Being and Time). This great philosophic epoch making paper's one of the most important propositional term is certainly adjective "eigentliches" in its masterpiece, then one paper about it discribes like next.
Certainly original nature is acquring original self presence as the particular cognition over anomimous Da-Sein(present being) as Das Man(people) which could delete each own personality and all the others. ✽1

In other words, at his claim, meanwhile, original thing is suggested so implicitly, evading direct description. That original presence's awareness necessarily outputs original time either at this debating context. 

①Original time as "God's Time" by Himself

②Not Original Time as our world's carnally and worldly meant time. It means optimistic moratorium to the future in no having desperation concerned with each one's individual sudden death as mortality inescapable destined facts for us, that must mean either Oblivion to Being ”Seinsvergessenheit”. Being caused from it, we can have carnally socially serving activity or business world commonsense, because, if we have only original time as God's providence, our any service and business activity could never be done, then our society consistently set the moratorium for social consciousness neglecting each one's particular meant time. 

That time could be defined as Practical Time for us. At the matter of fact, future thing is anytime present thing toward which future must come to us as premise. Then, our socially and publicly cognitive time could be possible to set. 
Then, at this series, I almost have focussed on only business operation and work assessment's necessity. Nevertheless, in terms of our time nature, it must have surely infinite date dsiplaying as long as our planet would be present.
However, in spite of our social premise, we could define that even this time could be out of the blue interrupted its running, eventually its permanent running just expediently must be set by us as our potential optimism. In other words, what future must be present everlastingly as supposition must be our time's socially initial setting for this human world.

Then, necessarily next two mutually diffrentiated time definitions could be provided to us, as Original Time, and Never original Time as our using very expedient time. 
To any individual, only Original Time must be given, nevertheless, we usually use only Never original Time, that must be Heidegger's Oblivion to Being as ”Seinsvergessenheit”. And with his Verfallenheit as Decay. However, we easily interpret two of them in co-existence, but essentially two thimgs must be at hostility, then necessarily with our introspective mind, we have introspectiove time this series has iteratively emphasized. 

③That Introspection Driving Time as Heidegger's terms ""✽2 spending must be the third Time for now us debating these propositions.

Eventually this the last ③That Introspection Driving Time must be our the most integral humanistic and humane time as present being as human . This means acquirement to original self being as "Eigentliches Selbstsein". Then he does never mention any God or religious opinion, but it's essence could be either so religious credo,then its cognitive sense must be so notional as entity "Einheit" as readied for our introspective cognition to our presence as human being. 
This notional and either so theological meditation could be very symmetrical to practical time for working, but we intrinscially have these mutually symmetrical pendulum so subconsciously in turn, or ocassionally so mixed at mutually mingled mentality, then very practically objective grasp must be significantly crossed with so devinity driving meditation.Then these two mutually symmetrical thining and contemplating ideas are never so easily divided to each other, that our very subconscious nature must suggest that analytical philosophy and phenomenology are on very subconsciously indivisible relevance, then very materialistic view and theological one could function or be mobilized so synchronically. 

❄Then, necessarily our bodily ethologically instinctive usage and personal acts and very notionally ideas driven theological view holding could be so totalized somewhat as mind function, psycologically and philosophically or either so anthropologically or physically at not so remotely presenting mutually relevant substance. Because if its idea would be fault, our usually spending nerve as assimilating our consiousness with time transiting clock making time and callender displaying order must never be embodied at our really realized reality.❄

This time's conclusion is that triple relevance as ideas' "Mutual Fructuating and Saturating to Each Other", and for knowing this idea so certainly and definitely, the last paragraph's emphasis❄～❄ as theory suggestion is the most important. 

(to be continued)

Feb. 15th. 2021  

Quoting from
✽1確かに本来性は、私と他者の差異を抹消する「ひとMan」としての
匿名的な現存在から、その固有な「本来的自己存在eigentliches Selbstsein」を獲得することにある（vgl., SZ, 130）。http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/re/k-rsc/hss/book/pdf/no101_05.pdf
file:///C:/Users/owner/Downloads/4112.pdf

""✽2→ Verfallenheit, Seinsvergessenheit and Eigentliches Selbstsein in gap we can be aware of at propositional understanding.