〇If we calmly and composedly explicate all of world religions’ fundamental dogmas with its holy Bible or so, we must be aware of that any religion must be shared the universal common character. Surely Judaism’s history had experienced forking or diverging to Christianity, in its process, Islamism grasped its divergence so negative, the believers of it exactly set the absolute differentiated dogma toward Christianity which had been apt to promote the hostile emotion to each other, it would be so correct fact, but if we carefully read them all, all religions are never impossible to understand each other only with objective views. Just what we must be noticed of is the absolute truth that in background of one religion was composed at the tribes or ethnic groups, particularly own natural condition of the people had been accompanied with them so complexed, especially the geographic condition makes the people go against the tough situation in each differentiated condition, its characteristic difference had made so many walls each between all religions so spiritually and mentally. Arears enough available to the water supply and never so convenient arears have each different circumstance, former with Southern East Asia, latter with Middle East or South Africa in terms of many items. At the district where anybody can be cooler at the place somebody sat than normal place, for example in dessert or so that kind of areas or at district even if being accompanied with a river, that water is never so appropriate for drinking, necessarily so differentiated creed in religious emotion would bud or pop up to the people. Thus, on the contrary, if we are noticed only to it, mutually we could evade at least unnecessary hostile battle. For example, surely pork is so easily rotten even at greenhouse wet climate areas. Just coz of it, we must quickly cook it as long as we could. Much less the Middle East zone must have had prohibit eating pork. Of course, condition to feed them was never so appropriate nor suitable in terms of so diverse meaning as necessary condition. Thus, the propositional matter is dependent on what kind of stance any tribes or ethnical groups should have governed or reined, sovereign, for uniting any each people’s mind together, in discernment among all of religions caused form idea’s difference, and just with it, so many tough battles or wars were deployed all over the world, in each religion groups’ sects with tough struggles. It was shown at comparatively recent past, the Protestant Reformation in Europe, in Japan, Buke-Shakai as Samurai families in tough battles, either. But so strangely, we can discover the so similar ideas in so distanced area’s nation or nationalities rarely we could meet them when they shipped to our own nation, in other words, any ethnic groups have had so diverse and universal similarity to any other them except them, even if we could listen to the dispatches from them as topical episodes, thus we can discover the similarity to our own legacy as ideas or so to them. In other words, in conclusion, utterly distinct civilizations have shared the similar ideas or notions universally to all areas and any civilizations even among completely irrelevant them since each ancient epoch. For a while let’s think about that kind of thing.

〇However, belief of religion must be ordinarily selecting only one thing in so many existing them in the world, with some so persuasive reason so privately for any individual, in abandoning other all religions’ dogmas, for absorbing only own selected one. Therefore, any religion’s conversion must have never meant the mutual differentiated religion’s creed to each other. But simultaneously, if we look around the world, extraordinary hating demonstrations in terms of politically religious ideas, in mutual misunderstandings or prejudiced ideas to each other, so hostile relation is kept to each other nowadays, so extremely. Thus, in these situations we can witness, we cannot easily be noticed to the necessary natural environmental difference causing any ideas’ gaps or habitual acts, with these, mutual suspicious dark demon minded behavior, we are apt to keep in our own mind, just coz of it, I have an idea that we will solve the misunderstandings so contradictory to mutual gap promoted by our own unconscious prejudice to each other, and find out the bit method to do so would never be meaningless. Thereby, theism can admit any pantheism, atheism, that fact or so kind of why our mental and spiritual implicit mind rule to make any other religious dogmas to own side so egoistically, thus why the believers of theism as theists could never admit neither atheism or they are obliged to do so might have been thought in terms of just theology nor only philosophically. At these ideas’ phase, I inquire Christianity’s old and new testaments and Koran, Mencius, Xun Kuang, Shinran (as Jodo-Shinshu’s founder)’s Kyogyo-Shinsho would be included to my study for developing my inquiry range. Because as if in assorted each different area’s myth we can discover the similarity, even any religion is adopted to this example. Its possibility must be guaranteed by what I was never baptized to be a Christian or any other believer with no initiation to me yet. Of course, I am surely rationally thinking God’s presence, I join with deism as I can set logically God as to be so necessary. Then I am deist to think that idealistically logically believing the necessity of God. However, deist may have been thought or seen as atheist, for the ones of theists so close existence seen by them. But for example, Buddhism or Taoism surely would be distinct toward theistic notions, but all those things would never be explicated to be natural belief as superstitious ideas, Confucius’s founding Confucianism is either than generally thought, it could be so close to theisms even we could judge, at this paper, I will go on to writing this without any prejudiced ideas that any religions except Christianity or Islamism must be neglected. And at this premise, so important stance is doing a method to explicate and elucidate the general misunderstandings around the gap between inherently evil theory and inherently good theory to us, at this rate, I would choose a stance that both thinking idea as a thinking behavior are never converse to each other as the ultimate idea so authentically , at the matter of fact, both ideas are relevant to each other so closely, both very entangled each other we could say either. I want to show my stance here, because inherently good theory must be according to what we admit evil minded our mind as a premise, but we are never promoted to just evil as leaving us to the outside power, and realize the reason, thus its idea must be belief to our good will indigenously as the power to choose only justice, in acting everything, but on the other hand, even if we just believe our own goodness of our mind so reasonably and surely, in inherent evil theory even so fair person would make his or her decision to attack the enemy to be with attempt to damage our own beloved ones, as self-defensive attitude and will, toward its entire fact for us, eventually we could explicate that any possibilities must never be neglected in terms of our deliberation as a stance to take our mind just, just two poles for example Capitalism and communism as West and East mutual hostile emotional relation, as if recently we can witness tariff’s war, but essentially the inherent both two theories are different from its unhuman acts to reduce our mutual trust and reason keeping together, our stance must never be the same to its futile hostility, I believe that all readers must understand what I said. Next time, with several religious fundamental dogmatic proposition in meant understanding and comparison to each different dogma and but with different meaning universal viewpoint, I would like to consider these problems. One would be for Judaism and its diverging Christianity in a process, and Islamism’s critical viewpoint of their dogma, afterward of two separations, and eventually we must reach the result any differentiated religion must be reviewed in method to look over each outside those true aspect, so resembling role playing in these different acts or as the prophets or disciplining believers, at the matter of fact, reason to be would be discovered so easily. Thus, I’d like to apply never sect dogmatic choice, fundamentally so individual private human’s mind and its reason to exist, I would estimate only it may have never been sect view, actually just individual reason to be, was to be regarded as so important.
(May 31-June 2.  2019)

First, upped at another  glogging site, two years ago. Encore of it!