One peninsula originally had very many ethnic ones at mutually admitting adjacency. However, at some eras, one powerful military at one ethnic unit's governing order started to reign. To the power, many ethnic ones so far advocates.  

Nevertheless, that ever consensus made order was originally not reach mutual perfect accord.

And gradually, that mutually not perfectly solved emotion and discontent cognition could smolder and at last at one timing, mutually both sided ones' own anger could erupt and war ir easily regarded so correct to each other, both domestically and globally with justice cognition.

Otherwise, that iteration could be world human history.

Certainly, the side first attacking unit could be blamed and reproached by global community, but attached sided unit either has own responsibility.

Additionally, first to attacked sided unit, very many units showed sympathy, though another condemned sinfully regarded first attacker was excited so much and the unit could never withdraw.

Yes, to both sides, withdrawing bravery takes so much power and perseverance.

At this these days very twisted global harmony, seen west sided ones as country units had extremely quick response and the made current was triggering so many contradictory problems.

After all, first anti-war advocating attacker unit citizens who rejected outing own country changed political stance. That example necessarily attacked unit's ones are the same.

Consequently, only already successfully immigration made ones at both sides can claim peaceful solution and that justice. In other words, war reality's facing degree must divide either the same ethnic identified nationality and domesticity.

Certainly, first attacking unit's act was seen the worst in global community. Nevertheless, that community must have decisive shortage of both units equivalency regarding mutually concessive chance seeking.

In other words, at first step of warfare's starting, regarded west sided countries hurried at regarding as only attacker the evil and attacked only just, that globally west-sided ones as country units could have instigated mutually entangled enmity and mess-up in those regions war is excited and never found peaceful negotiation's chance and the best timing.

After all, first invaded sided unit was executing attacker's military strategist's assassination in error trial of outputting unnecessary sacrifice as perfectly innocent directly unconcerned targeted thinker's daughter's life. The exampled case is tip of iceberg in many mutually made unnecessary errors.

At first step of war starting, west-sided onds should have made effort of hearing both sides own remark, not only supporting first attacked unit.

That originally made mistake was re-excited first attacker and attacked unit's nationalism in perfect justice abiding no doubt to counterattack.

Mutually unnecessarily excited emotion is stirred up to maximal level, necessarily journalism's responsibility should be reconsidered.

(Irregularly continued)

Oct.11th.  2022

Appendix; Global west-sided mass-communication network's harsh responsibility must be at first war step, only to attacked sided unit, extremely regarding as justice, though west sided allies could be excited to supply many up to date arms, bombing wisdom with drones attacking. Though necessarily, attacked sided ones as the unit's peaceful solution idea holders chance to negotiate peace was squashed, and that thing must be applied at attacker unit's that idea holding ones, consequently, only mutual heavily never escapable war swamp and mass-communication's only one side advocating justice abiding preoccupation dragging reality.

After all, only exile and war was left behind two countries.