At least Christianity, e.g. through Martin Luther's "De Captivitate Babylonica Ecclesiae Praeludium" in interpreting the described truth mentioning thing is correctly obviously shared strict rank.

Though at least at Christianity, any ceremonial duty is mere spontaneous nor subjectively volunteer acting. Because from the beginning, being spontaneous or being volunteer must have instituted at modernized eras, though basically at theological necessity around Jesus Christ words or so is fundamentally perfectly divided to our humanized own interpretation.

What Christianity is just derived from strictly binding order to Christian, to that thing, Luther mentioned like next in referred text as declaration of his pious Christianity's apostle.

（Ordained) Christianity churches do never know Sacrament called Ordained. It was provided by the church by the Pope. Because it was never what we can find the promise of charity or mercy.

What we confess as belief's clause is certain, simple, it must be reasoned with the words by Holy Bible in clearance. However, in terms of this Sacrament, these are never valid.

Upper description's subsequent sentences current in logical term and its definite significance must consist in what we at least at being Christian, we have to obey Holy Bible's own oracle.

There we can confirm obvious prohibition around holding relative idea around rank and ranking.

According to Christianity, we should never be positively spontaneous, rather in front of the words by G od, we must have absolute obedience in front of Sacrament. That is M artin L uther's very basic theory principle.

At least what could be derived from the obvious truth, at least at premise of instruction through Christianity, we must have mission to be strictly Promise's submission. That must be formally regarded Christianity's own dogmatized reason.

Luther's religion reformation must mean so stoic rigid sustenance around believing in God's oracle absolute obedience. In other words, respecting Sacrament is what we'd never be allowed to doubt.

However, at the matter of fact, Occidental philosophy academic history told through e.g. Ludwig Wittgenstein's words, "Toward what we'd never be able to talk, we must have silent appearance." as Logish- Philosophische Abhandlung (Ger)/ Tractatus Logico-P hilosophicus(Eng)

Actually, as long as we refer Anautical philosophy, we can confirm that its traditional thought must originate in Christianity. And in Phenomenology that footprint must be found so certainly. (that mentioning wil be done at upcoming future)

In other words, epistemological and empirically, ontologicaly interpretable extent and either rationally, realistically any stance must attend our own absolute obedience around God's words in awareness of Sacrament. In other words, we'd approach truth of Christianity. And at least at those clause comprehension, these days' global society's own doings must have need to introspect so deeply. We could articulate so.

(Irregularly continued)

Nov. 26th.    2022