Paul Ricouer interpreted the intrinsic difference between moral and ethics through thad idea that former consists in rule and regulations which we must keep and never break and infringe, meantime ethics means that even if these protocol coule not be provided to us as not formally ordered situation and condition, according to our mind's own subjectivity around morale and humane mindful our intrinsically guided conscience and reasonably considerable care and affectionate own acting. ❇️

Through according to his Interpretation, moral consists in praise and punishment duality dimensional Idea's notion or concept, on the otheqg hand, ethics consists in merely our positively and active spontaneity abiding basic humanity grounded idea. Summarized significance is definitely so.

By the way, today's philosophy depends on some several integral categorizations. That is very classical grasping attitude for professional academic circle commonsense. That is Phenomenology and A nalytical Philosophy.

However, relatively both different streaming circle could share Philosophy of Mind.

And that ideas and ideological background contains either theology and its basic ideas. There belong to both Ontology and Epistemology. These are not always switchable to realism and idealism, otherwise, materialism and nominalism.

Because in fact, all those mutually partially correspond to each other and mutually differ together.

These very sensitively subtle gap which is extrinsically phenomenally appearing and made must cotain our brain and mind's essence and substantial nature. That could be interpreted oq analyzed with either fluctuation and fragility or resilience and elasticity.

These our immanent and extrinsic to some extent contradictory and ambiguous nature abiding formally composed reality to us.

E.g. ontology is never equalized with realism. Far fro it, these are mutually essentially perfectly different dimensional. Because realism means observable and confirmable. However Ontology means partially nominal and metaphysical and not notinal nor conceptual, nevertheless it is either not only interpretable dimensional approach. it must be the one in human activity, the most totalled and the most obvious and the most a-pri-ori.

Meanwhile, Epistemology means apos-teri-ori and very analyzable and inspection abiding correctness demanding attitude. However, Ontology means preceded and higher degree Premising prepared at asstmed and supposed propositional absolute dimensional capture, on the other hand, Epistemology means practical realistic and measurably demanding correctness.

Though, Ontology is abstractly direct and straight, meantime Epistemology is concretely indirect and circumlocution abiding. 

Though ONTOLOGY is JUMPED PREMISING ATTITUDE, meanwhile EPISTEMOLOGY is ROUNDABOUT PROCEDURAL EVIDENTIARY.

Though any science is never ontological but very realistic. Nevertheless in spite of that science is rather perfectly epistemological, though merely objective, meantime philosophy  is, in terms of its correspondence, very subjective but that subject is rather very obvious at our mind.

At the matter of fact, there our mind's own Impossibility and incapable nature perfectly divided from material. None the less, even psychology must use both materialized analysis toward our mind. Objectivism exist there.

If very intuitively we should summarize those all, we all must judge all, according to what we want us so fair and objectively, none the less, we'd never wipe out our own intuitively regarding mind from our inspection and experimentally positivism abiding experiment.

After all, we by ourselves know that twisted and mutually contradictory our mind's realities and nature, at one necessity, science is what our sensible mind demands as the most credible criterion, but simultaneously philosophy, ethology and ethics are dealt with our another nature demanding abstractly direct conceiving abiding just justice and mindful satisfactory demanding.

Though we all are sprit at mutually very divisional dimensional mind's schemes.

(Irregularly continued)

Dec. 11th.    2022

Appendix; Analytical philosophy deals with that split our nature abiding mind, though very divorcing method dependent academism. On the other hand, Phenomenology deals with totalled entirely conceivable mind though essentially it's body abiding mind's deal, though very scientific, otherwise ethologically dealt and drafted. Meantime, Anatlytical Philosophy deals with very analyzed divisional viewpoints and factors, though very theologically religious mind's inclined inspection abiding. Ethics are or to define, between those two mutually differentiated role charged neutral academism. But that intrinsically very basic Sociology's basis. Just as I articulated, Ricouer's mentioning indicates rule and punishment abiding extrinsic objectivism is ethics and moralstic philosophy. Meantime subjectivity consciousness spontaneity abiding scholarship is theology. Because it's so positivism abiding in comparison with ethology. Though ethology is neutral. And Law and jurisprudence is based on theory inherently human's wicked, as negativism abiding idea's basis attending.

Those so entangled and twisted mutual complexed whole appearance is shown to us as digested picture around academism.

By the way, theology is, because of former mentioning, never always theory of human is inherently goodness abiding, far from it, it depends on rather strictly based on Old Testament as inherently human is wicked, though that purification necessity abiding New Testament's necessity means spontaneity abiding religious community's essence attending Christianity has reason to exist.(in comparison to Judaism as Old Testament.)

❇️ Soi-meme com un autre, Le Seuil, 1990