One compatibility makes us feel comfort and being accustomed with it makes another inconvenience seen so inconvenient. 
And what makes its inconvenience unnecessarily as own felt situation in mind makes us who can feel its inconvenience to feel irrationality, on the other hand, for the ones whose sensitivity feels it not irrational, former sensitivity must feel so selfish desire.

In the end, one convenience is composed with the circumstance around which it's convenience is felt so universally could be driven to isolated in a circle of which convenience is rationally felt by many ones.

Line as telephone free charge service is seen very convenient for the users whose general words is Japanese must be felt so inconvenient for the ones whose generally used words is English as business tool, in other words, in world, the circles in which members are universally awkward at using one universal tool e.g. English must have own sensitivity in which any skillful ones around using English feel inconvenient and its skill makes the one isolated in the circle.

Nevertheless, so stark is it possible to make the reality the proposition of poesy composing essence? Are these all own circumstances the possible proposition as the compatible tool or arm for expressing literature creative world ( that must be one meta-physical translation tool )?
In other words, are these all in which convenience or inconvenience in option is included as sensitivities could be adapted for poesy composing identity or intrinsic nature?

If these very contemporary difficult circumstanced proposition could never be applied for poesy, poesy thing could be seen and felt for the ones whose sensitivity is pleasantly dogmatized by contemporary social rationalized tools usage, so out of date, and in the situation almost ones could see and feel these days convenience so rational, otherwise, literature in own poesy could be out of date as it over heyday, that cognition could be fixed in most popularity, but is it so welcoming sensed reality?

(Irregularly continued)

June. 9th.   2023

Appendix; For the users of which mainly focused strategy is based in English usage, in fact,  Apple commodities is seen inconvenient for daily usage. Actually, in US, not i-PAD, as Android typed tablet terminal is the most popular.
These decisive crevasse is actually overshadowing Japan and US, but as politically, militarily, deplomatically, the US and Japan alliance is so strict, that reciprocal strategy or strategical reciprocity is very strange necessity, at least to me, that idea could easily emerge in mind, what should be interpreted in front of these twisted realities?